May 09, 2008

Research help needed

Yesterday, the McCain campaign got into a little pissing contest (the first of many, one hopes) with the Obama campaign over McCain's remark that Hamas would love to see Obama elected.

When I heard this, (and Obama's ineffectual answer like "Oh well, he's a geezer, geezers get it wrong sometimes") I had an immediate harken back to last year, when (I'm very sure about this) Hamas actually issued such a statement that they hoped Obama would win.

I was going to skewer the Obama folk for this here, but I haven't been able to come up with the quote, which I believe was from Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hamas in Lebanon.

Am I wrong, could it have been President I'm-ding-a-ling of Iran who made the claim of support for Obama, or could it have been both of the Islamist nut jobs?

We need to lock this down. Various anti-US leaders around the globe have been mumbling thoughts about how they believe they can essentially wrap Obama around their little fingers once he's elected, for over a year now, and we need to keep a running score on those statements, and keep them in front of EVERYONE.

I'm a little weak on setting up search engines to find stuff, and the keywords I ran last night were "Nasrallah on Obama" but got nothing except articles where both might have been mentioned in the same article, but not Nasrallah extolling Obama.

A little help please?

May 08, 2008

Twi-nite Doubleheader

Arriving at the appointed time (1800 PDT) for my HR-218 qualifications, I found I was at the back of a long line waiting for the opportunity to shoot on a small range.

The Tri-County range complex is a strange place, with lots of little ranges that were borrow pits, as the entire place is a former gravel mine. The Lake Oswego Police Department, which conducts this Qualification for local retired officers (theirs and other local jurisdictions) was assigned a range not capable of taking more than 13 shooters at a time, and about 70 showed up. It seems that most of the geezer cops who came to be qualified disregarded the instruction in the confirmation email which said not to arrive early. Most except myself and 4 others, most of whom I knew from my police career. I got there at 1748, and there was already qualification shooting going on.

So, it turned into a gab-session at the back of the line, and by 2000 hours, we were finally in the paperwork processing part of the drill, which went fast enough, and with a 2028 sunset time staring us in the face, we commenced the first qualification attempt 20 minutes before sunset, in a hole in the ground, on a cloudy evening, with a cold wind blowing.

I had skulled this out beforehand. I intended to shoot in both the revolver and pistol classes, so as to be certified to carry any handgun. My revolver was to be Shorty, my Ruger SP101. It does NOT have night sights, only a two-color, painted-on scheme of my own invention. I shot it first. I passed the qual with 100% in the K-5. Mandatory passing is 100% for all 5 stages. There were about 4 of the group I was in who had to shoot again (do-overs get the range to themselves while re-trying), but they all succeeded the second time, so by five minutes after sunset we were ready for second guns.

I strap on my Kel-Tec P11 9mm, which has a very clear three-dot sight set-up, similar to a Sig-Sauer or Walther P-99. It's even clearer than factory issue, because I over-coated the factory enamel in the dots with "Liquid Paper".

Yep, "White-out" is your buddy on a twilight shoot. I shot a very respectable group averaging 7" over the whole qualification, all stages.

It was not as easy at it sounded, though. On the FIRST round of the FIRST stage, where we run from the 15 yard line to the 12, drop down behind a barricade (55-gallon drum), peek around the barricade, acquire the target and bring it under fire with the strong hand, one round only, I took a bad grip on my pistol while trying to maximize my concealment (which we weren't being evaluated on, but I play by ALL the rules). I got a nasty "slide-bite" on the top of the mid-knuckle thumb of my left hand. I proceeded to the next round, a peek-over the top of the barricade and one shot on the target, then for the third shot, I had to put the gun in my off-hand (again, to maximize the reality of the training, most shooters fire this shot using a strong-hand grip, but you expose most of your body that way), and I fired the final peek-around shot of the stage with blood FLOWING from the wound.

As I finished and holstered, I immediately reached for a "field-dressing", my cleaning rag, a 4"X8" piece of old T-shirt, and I fashioned a bandage and tied it on. The Range Master is watching me with interest now, and I give him a thumbs-up (very visible, with bandaged thumb) and he gives me one back, so I am good to go. I had to adjust the bandage a couple of times during the following stages, but I shot one of my best-ever quals with that little Kel-Tec, now properly named "Slasher".

"Slasher" came equipped with two 10-round magazines, one having the finger-extension on it, and one not. Both are made by Mec-Gar, an Italian firm which makes very good magazines. I was shooting the last round of the last stage, a two-yard quick-draw encounter simulating a field interview gone bad, where we throw our notebook in the opponent's (target's) face as a distraction while drawing and firing a double-tap, then shifting sideways in a ready position to engage again (but not engaging, fight's over). The non-finger-extender equipped mag was in the gun.

The P11 smokestacked on the last round of the double tap. A peculiar kind of smokestack. I did a "tap, rack and go", but (and I spent a half hour with dummy rounds trying to duplicate this last night), somehow, the empty hull got caught in the lips of the magazine, instead of the usual smokestack where it is resting on top of the magazine lips. The next immediate action is a magazine change. Now, the shoot is actually over at that point, but we have not been given the final command ("Holster an empty weapon"), so I'm supposed to have an operational pistol. I then discovered that it's DAMN HARD to get the magazine out of the P11 with a bandaged hand, and no finger-extension to grip. That WILL be remedied.

At the conclusion, the Range Master came over, looked at my target, looked at my hand, and just shook his head and grinned, quipping something to the effect of, "You've been retired HOW long and you STILL take this shit seriously as if you were going out on patrol at midnight?" then, "You don't need EMS for that mangled thumb, do you?"

I thanked the Lieutenant for his concern, and told him I had a first-aid kit in my POV, and would clean it up and apply a proper bandage, and I was going right by Urgent Care on the way home if I needed more help.

I was so cold, and so pumped at having done it RIGHT, that I never noticed the pain until the truck heater had been on for 15 minutes.

May 07, 2008

You need a fat ass

No, you REALLY do need a fat ass if this study is correct.

Imagine that.

This might just be the end of the "Twiggy" phenomenon in modeling.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to get an ice cream sundae to the range for my HR 218 quals, still fitting into my 36 jeans from 20 years ago.

May 06, 2008

Running Amok with numbers

While our attention is focussed on the price of oil and it's refined derivatives, other players in the global market economy have stuck THEIR knives in our backs.

Consider that major brands of soda pop used to sell for (full retail price) $3.60 or so for a rack. On deep discount, usually before various warm-weather holidays, that price would drop to $2.40. Now come the pre-Memorial Day sales and the price has dropped to.....about $3.60 a rack from about $5.20 or so.

I used to drink a lot of branded pop. I swill cheapy stuff now.

Consider that a T-Bone steak used to sell for $5.00/# at a sale. Found any for under $8.00/# recently?

I eat cheaper cuts of beef now.

A battle-pack of South African 7.62 NATO M80 Ball used to cost $28.00 for 140 rounds, about 15 months ago. That same battle pack is about $80 today (and a couple of years older). 9X19 UMC 115-grain ammo was as cheap as $5.99/box of 50 a year ago, now $9.99. .308 hunting loads used to be $13-16 a box of 20, but those same boxes today are creeping up on $40.

I used to toss all my brass. I save every hull now and reload with lead.

I'm sure this is all highly fiskable by an Econ person. So fisk it.

In return for fisking it (which you may do in the comments if you like), all I ask is that you take out the last three check registers from your file cabinet and add up a typical month's bills and cash ATM withdrawals from your checking account, and post them for 15 months ago, 10 months ago, five months ago and this month.

You will have fisked yourself.

You may not call it recession, you may call it something else, or you may persist in saying the economy is fine, but your checkbook won't lie to you.

The (D)onk candidates haven't been talking about the economy much. Come November, they won't have to, it will be the #1 item on ALL voters' minds.

B.O.H.I.C.A.

May 02, 2008

Captcha is back

Sorry, the experiment of doing without Captcha (the little hidden number box you have to copy into another box to get your comment published) is finished. The spambots re-discovered my blog after less than a week, and I am getting them over a dozen at a time now. Typepad, my blogging engine, doesn't seem to be able to deal with them effectively at the server level anymore.

For those who don't realize it, spam is more than a nuisance. Spams carry a much higher level of viruses, trojans, etc than do ordinary emails, and I would hate to have someone click on a spam comment, follow a link in it and have their computer trashed. Not on MY watch, babe.

Captcha is re-installed. If anyone experiences a failure to post on a comment, just right-click the body of your message, choose "copy" go to your email engine and paste it into an email and send it to perspac@yahoo.com I will then publish it through my editing function. Don't forget to put in your horsepower (blogging name, email and website) if you want that published with it, as well as the post you want the comment attached to.

Gotta go, but all y'all have fun out there and try not to run down any neurosurgeons, I might be needing one soon and I want to have a good selection of them, heh.

May 01, 2008

Sick bay

...back in Sick Bay, back failed with lumbar spasms again. Flat on butt in bed on heating pads and bags of frozen peas.

Damn inconvenient, I may not be able to boat in the Opening Day Parade this weekend, and I also have to shoot to qualify for my HR218 card next week....

April 28, 2008

Recession

Recession is an ugly word for politicians, and most of whom can be trusted to not utter it at all. So goes our President Ostrich, blissfully telling us that because indicators x and y are not negative, we're not in recession. Well, a kid in the sixth grade who reads newspapers or watches CNBC or FNN could tell you that the indicators have been "cooked" to the point that we could be in a full-blown Depression and today's indicators wouldn't even have us in Recession yet.

Well, we're in a Recession. How do I know, the one who freely admits to almost flunking bonehead Econ in college?

Warren Buffet says so. In case you don't know him or just got in from Planet Zargon, Warren Buffet is the country's richest man, and got that way by astute investment.

Mr. Buffet says we're in a Recession, so we're in a Recession.

NRA's next shill (UPDATED)

...isn't for gun rights, it's selling WINE for $6.99/bottle, which is either a loss-leader or it's "two-buck Chuck" and not worth swilling.

Am I the ONLY one who thinks that the NRA is like a kid in a candy store here? They are absolutely nutso with their mailing list. They are worse than Publisher's Clearing House.

Does anyone out there have a clue as to who I might direct a polite letter to within that benighted organization? A person who actually gives a rip about how we feel about our NRA?

Perhaps a movement to boycott this year's convention is in order.

You will note that I haven't even mentioned the propriety of an organization supposedly devoted to teaching gun safety selling alcoholic beverages....

******************************************************************************

UPDATE: 042808 2106 PDT: Just when you thought the NRA couldn't get worse, I open my mail and there is a letter, dated 4/12/08, asking me to renew my membership. Fine. Except my current membership extends until 11/30/08, or over seven months from the date of this letter of renewal. I have zero other memberships in anything that would ask me to renew an annual membership when I had over half of it remaining. Not only that, but the letter, signed by Wayne LaPierre, who I USED to respect, tries to lay a guilt trip on me if I don't renew this early:

"Also, you'll save the NRA the cost of sending more notices. That means more of your dues can go directly to critical NRA projects including our safety programs, our crime-fighting efforts and, most important, our fight to save your guns!!!"

OK, Mr. LaPierre, here's a flash for you: I don't want you to save my guns, I want you to help save my gun rights. There IS a difference, and you don't seem to notice that difference much. My guns aren't going anywhere without my OK, but under the NRA's stewardship, my gun rights have been steadily eroding.

Oh, and while I'm responding to your letter, let me add that it's YOUR CHOICE to send me all these early renewal notices which incur you additional administrative overhead expense. I know perfectly well when my membership dues are due, thank you, and rest assured that you will get them sometime in November.

******************************************************************************

A little culture help, please

OK, I crossed culture lines and went to an upscale, very hip Martini Bar yesterday. Actually, I'm renting the establishment to throw a swank cocktail party for my youngest daughter, who is graduating from Oregon Health & Sciences University Medical School 6/3, and starting her medical practice there (as an Intern, then Resident Doctor, in OHSU's Trauma-Level ER on 6/15). So, if you get shot, knifed or run over on the west side of the city, she might very well be the first one asking you if it hurts. Heh-heh, EMT joke from the old days.

At the upscale, very hip Martini Bar (in the upscale, very hip Pearl District of Portland), the hip patrons (and the publicans as well) all sport various forms of piercings of the face and wherever else, and tattoos.

Lots of tattoos. It's "Portland Ink" down there in the former industrial district.

The gal who took our drink orders on the sidewalk had most of her entire upper body tattooed. The Pink Gin I had was delicious, and so was the look of her chest.

So, here's the question, and it crosses cultural lines:

Is it OK to stare at a lady's tattooed chest long enough to appreciate the form and the art of the intricate tattoos thereon?

Of course, your blogger has mastered the deceptive male head-turn maneuver, wherein my head turns so as to appear to be breaking the gaze, but the nystagmus of my eyes still tracks the object of interest, giving the appearance that I'm NOT staring at those womanly attributes. The VariLux darkening eyeglasses make this maneuver almost foolproof out of doors.

I don't think I should have to use the head-turn maneuver though. I think that if a lady has a bountiful AND artfully-decorated bosom, I should be able to openly hold my gaze on it. Especially if she's a publican in a rather revealing peasant blouse.

Here's my rationale. It is, of course, improper to stare at a lady's chest, per se (the chest itself). However, isn't it also impolite NOT to appreciate art that someone has gone to considerable time, money and pain to be able to display? I say the appreciation factor outweighs the older custom of politeness.

What say you?

Here we go again

More of AlGore's Revenge:

Pqr

Yep, that's a warning for snow, a foot in the mountains and a few inches in the foothills. Excuse me, but isn't the Merry Month of May just two days away?

...ANOTHER ROUND OF SNOW COMING TO THE MOUNTAINS OF SOUTHWEST
WASHINGTON AND NORTHWEST OREGON DURING THE FIRST HALF OF THIS
WEEK..

COLD SPRING WEATHER IS TAKING HOLD OVER SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON AND
NORTHWEST OREGON AGAIN DURING THE FIRST HALF OF THIS WEEK.

ANOTHER RATHER COLD SYSTEM IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC WILL LOWER SNOW
LEVELS TO BELOW CASCADE PASS ELEVATIONS TONIGHT...THEN DOWN TO
AROUND 2000 FEET TUESDAY AND WEDNESDAY.

SNOW ACCUMULATIONS IN THE CASCADES COULD REACH 6 TO 12 INCHES
BEGINNING LATE TONIGHT AND CONTINUING TUESDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY.

SNOW ACCUMULATIONS ABOVE ABOUT 2000 FEET IN THE COASTAL
MOUNTAINS...THE CASCADE FOOTHILLS...AND THE UPPER HOOD RIVER
VALLEY COULD REACH A COUPLE OF INCHES AS WELL.

IF YOU ARE PLANNING TRAVEL THROUGH THE MOUNTAINS OF SOUTHWEST
WASHINGTON AND NORTHWEST OREGON DURING THE FIRST HALF OF THE
WEEK...BE PREPARED FOR WINTER LIKE DRIVING CONDITIONS AGAIN.

It won't be fun boating in this slop on Saturday. It also won't be as much fun breaking in my new gas BBQ pit. Oh, well, at least the brewskis stay cold longer.

April 27, 2008

Scam alert!

First it was "Carbon Credits", the Ponzi Scheme of all time, now it's "Vetroleum"

Read this article. Read it knowing it has been written to bamboozle the reader.

Let's take some principles of the old "snake oil" type of scam and see if we can find them here.

1. Find everything a new name to make an older process (in this case, making biodiesel) seem like a breakthrough. We start with the very catchy word "Vetroleum". No, that's not correct. we should start with the reference "biocrude". It doesn't exist. Crude oil is a specific substance, namely petroleum oil pumped right out of the ground. It is "crude" or un-refined. There is no such thing as "bio-crude". If you are going to make biodiesel, you start with raw materials called biomass. At some point in your very long (not "8-minute") reaction, the substance you are cooking down in the presence of reagents, at high pressure, takes on characteristics of a long-chain oil molecule. You may then refine that substance, once it is fractionated (distilled and the fractional compounds removed) in the process (which is not called a "time reaction", it's Catalytic Cracking) into other products (in this case, they seemed to have refined it down into a form of volatile fuel usable as gasoline, but that is a HUGE waste of time, refining equipment and energy, it should be left at the earlier state where it resembles diesel).

2. Get impressive-sounding groups to push your snake oil for you. In this case, they've gotten the "Central American Parliament" on their payroll. Read about the CAP here, it seems to be a club that talks about economics, mostly, and wants to be a super-government like the European Union, but isn't recognized as such. Then get a "Large Corporation" with an impressive name to package your product. Here we find US Sustainable Energy Corporation, whose stock is listed here. That's right, it's a Penny Stock, in this case trading for a little over two cents per share, and three-quarters of the impressive looking 1.3 billion shares are restricted (and may not exist). The capitalization of their UNRESTRICTED stock (Book Value) is less than $750,000.

3. Finally you locate in place known for it's involvement (in energy here), and enlist well-known local government leaders to help you push your product. Baytown-Sugarland in Chambers County, Texas isn't exactly on the cusp of energy production these days. I was down in that area a few weeks ago, in Dickinson, and there didn't appear to be much in the way of energy production going on. Some old oilfields are being drilled for gas now, but that's about the extent of it. My guess is that the Chambers County Commissioner cited in the article isn't exactly an oil baron, either.

Nope, this is a scam designed to line the pockets of a few folks who get in early, and all the rest of the suckers who get in at the end are going to get nada as investors. Maybe this refinery will produce a few barrels of biofuel, but you wouldn't want to have to pay their production costs, and somehow, those aren't even talked about in the article, are they?

The world is going to see many, many fast-buck operators in the biofuel arena in the coming years. This is just one of the earlier ones, that's all.

H/T to the EllTee for this one.

April 25, 2008

Messing around in Boats...

...I've quoted it dozens of times, but I can't remember who said that bit about "messing around in boats"...but good on him!

It's time (according to the calendar), that the boating season start, and in fact, the Columbia River Yachting Association Opening Day boat parade is a scarce week away. I sit at the marina, and eyeball the snowpack at a bare thousand feet in the Coast Range, and was in this snow last week. It doesn't LOOK like boating season, but looks can be deceiving...

Last night, my old war buddy David S blew in from Phoenix, and I had his yacht ready for him, WITH TWO ELECTRIC HEATERS RUNNING TO WARM IT UP TO SURVIVAL TEMPERATURE! Yep, that's what we are facing here, and it is a microcosm of what the rest of the Northern Hemisphere faces this year...no summer (and you DIDN'T hear it here first if you have been following the TRUTH in climate change).

Nope, next weekend, I will dress in my formal yachting uniform, but I will have long johns and gore-tex under the Blue Blazer and White Duck pants as I sit on the flying bridge to anchor the fleet of Multnomah Channel Yacht Club past the review vessels. On the stern of "Lofoten Girl" will be the orange safety sign that indicates I am the rescue vessel for my yacht club, and not 45 minutes ago, I finished preparing my 50-meter floating tow-line, to be capable of taking a yacht up to 48 feet (our club's largest) in tow and returning it the twenty miles of windy Columbia, Willamette and little Multnomah Channel rivers to the yacht club if there is a propulsion failure. I'm better prepared for this duty than most, having a powerful twin-engine yacht and 8 years of experience in the Marine Patrol doing this work for a Marine Deputy's wages.

I just finished commissioning my new VHF-Marine  walkie-talkie, a Uniden  MHS350, and it checks out, along with the two fixed-installation VHFs aboard. I also just finished renewing ALL the ships' batteries ($$$$$!!!), and checked out the engines while moored in my berth, and they and their transmissions are ready for duty. I've de-winterized, so there better not be any more damn Arctic Outbreaks (the last one was last weekend!). The shore boat is on a temporary berth, the better to work the aft deck for any necessary rescue and towing work. As I write, the river rolls by my yacht at a bare 51 degrees, barely out of the winter-instant-death immersion temperature regime. Anyone falling overboard during the parade will have to be out of the river within 5 minutes, or rescue swimmers will be required to save lives. I have checked out my rescue throw bag/line and the three throwable livesaving devices I carry (only one is required, but I'll be damned to Hell if I'll be forced to choose who I throw my life ring to, so I have several).

I refuse to think about what this little 40-mile parade will cost me an my 1.7 mpg yacht at $4.00/gallon for fuel...but DAMN, I wish she was powered by steam and all I had to worry about was having enough cordwood aboard and the strong backs to muscle it down from the decks to the fire room...

April 24, 2008

Hype of the Year Award

Goes to the "online men's magazine FHM" which dares to tell me who the "sexiest woman of the year" is. What a complete load of crap. They present a list of skanks who couldn't spell "sensuous", let alone have any of that elusive quality.

Put it another way. If she is listed as the hottest of the hot, the men doing THAT rating would be impressed by an iceberg.

MY idea of hotties? I don't do the amount of research as he does, but Kim DuToit seems to have the category nailed on his blog.

April 23, 2008

Be very afraid...

The worst has happened. You, a CCW permitee who is carrying, are shopping in a store when an emotionally damaged person (EDP) enters with arms and the determination to take many people with him in his grand finale. He fires at you. You return fire.

You have engaged the shooter in a defensive gunfight, and by moving, correctly using cover and sparingly shooting, you have cornered the EDP in an area of the store away from the exits, and shoppers and employees have taken the opportunity to flee. Your role has switched from defensive to "hold your ground" tactics to keep the shooter bottled up so that he can't escape to do more damage outside.

The police finally get there, and entering the active shooter scene, see you first and take you under fire, hitting you. Your days are done. It matters not what happened to the EDP.

Sound extreme for a scenario? It's probably as close as it's going to get to what would actually happen.

What happened here?

The cops, responding to the active shooter scenario, are all business, and their adrenalin levels are ramped up. They see a gun in your hand and they fire. You died because you were concentrating on your armed enemy who was trying to kill you at the time, and you didn't see the officer first.

How did it come to this?

It came to this because of the "ninja" or "Tommy Tactical" mindset that  police are trained to these days.

As a cop first on the street in 1973, and retiring just as "Tommy Tactical" was taking hold here five years ago, I was taught that the use of deadly force REQUIRED first the evaluation of the scene THEN steps to make sure that the legitimate felon was the only one to be taken under fire, then finally verbal warnings ("FREEZE") before the trigger was pulled. The tactical situation depicted above was possible then, but had rarely occurred. SWAT call-outs in my entire city of 400,000 probably averaged 8 per year. There are now at least that many per month, and SWAT gets called out for perfectly ordinary felony warrant service (that one detective and one patrol officer, both armed with revolvers, used to do).

In the Tommy Tactical Age of policing, the deadly-force doctrine is much closer to the military doctrine (area denial fire, taking unseen enemy behind cover under fire, etc). Now the training emphasizes "see a gun, shoot the gunner". Voice commands to gun-armed persons are NOT given, under the theory that they only serve to give advantage to an armed enemy.

This change of doctrine from civilian/police to military/police tactics is going to cost a lot of lives, and especially at the point where citizens have to resort to firearms to defend themselves in urban settings. It's all un-necessary, and I can prove it.

One year in the mid-'70s, I reported with the rest of my shift for semi-annual firearms qualifications and training. We did the quals quickly, then several old-line detectives appeared and told us that we were going to assault a bunch of heavily armed bad guys holed up in a fortified building as a training scenario. We would be employing only our patrol revolvers, and LOTS of blanks were issued. The dicks had rifles with blanks and shotgun blanks also, in addition to their revolvers. The building was the old, boarded-up jail at Kelley Butte, right next to our range there. We had smoke grenades (or our Training Sgt did, he was leading us into "battle"). On the signal, about 8 of us moved out to envelop the building's perimeter, and we were immediately taken under fire from windows, the tower, everywhere in that building. We had to move forward, but we also had to remain concealed from the 4 dicks in the building, who were keeping notes on who they had "killed".

When it was all over, we learned:

  • Lightly armed deputies are at a HUGE disadvantage assaulting barricaded felons in a building, but CAN carry the day, but MUST expect to take casualties doing so.
  • The barricaded felons are going to die in the building, because even if they have decent cover, we had surrounded the building and they weren't getting out.

There was a thorough debrief afterwards, and we learned that half of us had been killed and almost everyone else wounded. I was listed as winged but not confirmed killed, which took two detectives to confirm. The detectives admitted that all of them would have either been killed or wounded due to the huge volume of aimed fire directed their way. In other words, we junior gunslingers achieved our goal of ending the days of a major gun-gang, but there would have been funerals and weeping wives and kids.

Weeping wives and kids are not allowed now. As I've railed at before in these pages, today's cops believe that by aggressive moves, such at shooting on sight of a firearm without warning, they can always go home to mama at the end of the day. In my book, that promise is NEVER made when you pin on the badge.

That "Tommy Tactical" philosophy needs to change. If I could wave my magic wand, cops would find their tactical ninja suits changed back to traditional police attire, and their training altered to determine who is an enemy and who isn't before opening fire.

The mere sight of a gun should never be cause to shoot a person, but read this little tidbit linked by David at "Of Arms and the Law", and you will see what I mean about today's ninja-cops.

Blogger's introspection

*******************************************************************************

LAST UPDATE: OK, I surrender! Any idea of hanging up my spurs is now shelved! You lurkers have me convinced! I apologize for thinking all of you were just after the Boobage. But that remembers me, I haven't published anything to Boobage in a while, have to remedy that little FUBAR.....

*******************************************************************************

UPDATE: 042308 2149 PDT: OK, I turned off Captcha....we'll see how much spam I get in comments. BTW, I'm IMPRESSED with the response so far...

*******************************************************************************

OK, soul-searching time.

I am asking myself who I am writing this blog for, and the answer comes back, myself. That's how it should be, since a journal is about recording what is happening around the journalist.

I get 700-800 reads on most days, but the vast majority of them are looking for the tit and ass in my "Boobs" section. I probably get 50-100 reads from people looking for my opinions and the facts I present along with them.

Even that's OK, because I get some feedback along with those reads.

Make that, USED TO get some feedback. I must have been asleep when a law was passed prohibiting commenting on Rivrdog posts, but the effect is there, my comments have fallen off to near zip.

I guess you could say that without the feedback of the comments, I have no way of knowing if I'm just whistling in the wind or how my opinions are received, and yes, I care how they are received.

So, I have decided to put myself and my blogging on probation for 30 days. If my writing brings an appropriate level of feedback, I'll continue, but if not, I'll announce a closing date, far enough in advance so that interested folks may peruse the blog and copy such items as they see fit, but at the end of THAT period, I will close my doors, ending this four-year experiment.

I have a typical writer's depression at having too little feedback. I had to give up on my novel because of legal (criminal) liability involved with the project as I was writing it (and I refuse to water it down with hyperbole so it wouldn't land me in jail as a terrorist), so I don't have that outlet for myself. I kept on with the blog, hoping to stimulate a few minds out there, but those minds are either gone or as stunted as mine.

If I close up shop, you haven't gotten rid of me. I will simply revert to reading blogs and commenting on them (which I find myself doing anyway, I'll just do more of it if my blog goes away). I might open a Facebook page also, but I'm going to take the money I save and treat myself to 40 extra miles of driving per month. See the country. Bucket list. All that.

Blog powered by TypePad