UPDATED! SEE BOTTOM OF POST.
***************************************************************************
I don't think she is a martyr, but by way of coming to that conclusion, we have to review our International Relations 101, which I took as a freshman at Mizzou in '61.
In those days, the realpolitik of the post-war (WW2) years were still in vogue, and were only starting to change to the New World Order way of thinking. My instruction was in that realpolitik.
Realpolitik is largely gone from the practice of international relations now, even though our friends on the Left constantly accuse GW Bush of practicing it.
International politics is now practiced from a variety of ethics-based viewpoints, ranging from Socialism to eco-Socialism.
That gives us problems where it concerns relations with nations like Pakistan.
Pakistan is a nation which has armed itself well, and therefore plays somewhat of a leadership role among the Islamic states in it's neighborhood.
The first rule of realpolitik is that you play by the rules of the group you are in.
That means that we need to recognize that Pakistan is always going to be a turbulent, unsettled nation, not really amenable to the blandishments of a representative democratic Republic such as this nation is. Islam has something to do with that, since, as a religion, it encourages the settling of conflict by dedication to the use of force (in the name of Allah, of course).
After he seized power, we left General Pervez Musharraf alone at first, following the First Rule, but lately, we had begun to pressure him to allow "democratic elections" with all the possible political leaders as candidates, and we insisted that he give up one of his twin mantles of power, either his control of the Pak Army, or his leadership of the civil government. This was mistaken policy, as events of last night amply illustrate. Realpolitik tells us that sometimes, the best government an unsettled nation can have is a "benevolent dictatorship", and Musharraf was the best example of a benevolent dictator we currently have in the panoply of nations.
Benazir Bhutto was no saint, even though you will now see her portrayed as one in all the media, who know an opportunity to defeat Realpolitik and advance the New World Order when they see one. Bhutto had formed two governments in the past, and both of them were rife with political corruption that led directly to her office door.
In other words, she played by Pak rules. She was no Indira Ghandi (if you assume Ghandi was squeaky-clean, which might very well be a false assumption). She was involved in the hurly-burly of dirty politics all the way. We and the Euros pressured Musharraf to let her back into the country from exile, following the New World Order belief that any Pak election held without her would be corrupt. Actually, given her past record of corruption, had she actually ran in the election, it wouldn't have cleaned it up a bit, because they just don't do clean elections in that part of the world (even when they have 130,000 US troops in the country to guarantee it).
Politics is a dirty business. Islamic politics redefines dirty downwards.
Take it to the bank.
****************************************************************************
UPDATE: 122807 0955 PST: Now this article coming out of Pak-land says that Bhutto died from bumping her head on the sunroof lever in an attempt to get out of her car? Major red flag here for me. It is EXTREMELY DIFFICULT for a person to put enough force on any part of the skull with an accidental bump to cause death by depressed skull fracture. I raise the BS Flag on that one. I'll bet you that the pathologist who made that finding is "unavailable" for further comment, permanently. One thing I find strange is that as a hunted figure, Bhutto should have known to stay in her (presumably) armored limo during an attack, as escaping to the outside is almost certain death in those types of ambushes. Where were her bodyguards? There should have been at least one in the car with her, and his duty would have been to expend his life to save hers, so he should have never let her open the sunroof to get out. Too many question here, so I refuse to accept any of the current explanations of her death that come from Musharraf's people.
****************************************************************************