...and from the Christian Science Monitor, no less.
Best debunking of anthropogenic global warming I've seen yet. The CSM also calls a spade a spade in the article, and refers to the entire "cap and trade" system as a means to redistribute income and consolidate Federal power, nothing more.
It seems to me, on logical analysis, that minus completely hypothetical "tipping point" arguments (no "tipping points" can be proven from the past), no scientist could ever sign on to AGW as anything but a theory such as someone the likes of Velikovsky could espouse.
Comments