I had no clue that there were gay sports leagues. This article about a falling out between one gay team and it's league Commission, is an eye-opener not just about sportz fever, but about the working of the fanatical gay mind.
Read the article, then come back and tell me that this sports league does not constitute a religious cult and nothing more, if you can. While your're at it, answer the question this brings up of why gay sportspeople don't think that they can compete with heteros in established leagues, but have to have their own leagues.
This is the proof we have sought for years that "special rights" are not Constitutional, but, when enshrined in the Constitution by mistaken Courts, make a laughingstock of the idea that we are a Nation of Laws under our Constitution, for when Law is invoked to enshrine ANY religion in the Constitution, the Constitution is dead and gone, and should be replaced.
I'm sworn to protect the Constitution, but this particular conflict between flavors of the sexually obscure, masquerading as protected classes, give me pause to reflect on my oath.
The Founders did not write this Constitution we have now, that being the Constitution I am sworn to protect with my life.
Does my oath then still bind me, if the Constitution has changed beneath the oath?
Or, am I free to assume I am not still bound, and may support conflict to end the travesty that is our present Constitution and restore it to it's former tone and former strength?