« Typepad is fixed, so I write... | Main | War Story from 1970 »

October 21, 2015

Comments

Richard Bergerson

Thank you for your update, correction, more information on this particular issue. All of what I sorta knew was in the OR rag, which was most definitely slanted against the return of the weapons. While the article was slanted and gun-haters jumped on the bandwagon, even reading such slanted "news speak", I could find no justification for non-return of said guns. Wasn't aware of this weasel "fair market value" ploy in a blatant attempt to circumvent the letter and intention of the law.
So, thank you for keeping us well informed.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Categories

Blog powered by Typepad