In the first bit of hard news out of Government Motors (formerly: General Motors), sometimes known as UAW Motors, the official end to the Saturn line of cars was announced.
Too bad, they were decent automobiles, I owned a used one for a while and my daughter drove it while an undergrad in college.
Saturn probably developed more die-hard followers than any GM-branded automobile, and their most recent ad wants you to continue believing that. The smiling gentleman in the Star Trek shirt DOES speak to your brand loyalty.
When "New GM" was foisted off on the world earlier this year, Saturn was sold to Penske, Inc. Roger Penske, better known for his auto racing endeavors, and a very successful truck rental fleet man to boot, bought the company on the condition that he could find another manufacturer to make the vehicles as is and also develop new automobiles to sell.
It was a tall order, and it never happened. I don't think that the first condition has ever been met outside of military vehicle production, and even then the specialty vehicles are usually made by one manufacturer. The second condition might have been possible, but there would have been a gap of several years for the Saturn system to weather between the cancellation of this years' vehicles and the next models, and such gaps are impossible to bridge.
The "automotive writers of Associated Press" put together a story on Saturn's demise, but strangely enough, in that story, there is no mention of how the profitable division came to such a sorry pass.
****************************************************************************
UPDATE: 100109 1216 PDT: AssPress has yet another story out, in much more detail as to the proposed Penske deal which fell through, BUT STILL NOT ONE MENTION OF THE UAW'S ROLE.
****************************************************************************
Blame the UAW for that, but, strangely enough, you won't see any mention of the union in the above story. UAW members built Saturn vehicles, but from the get-go in the eighties, the union had a monetary interest in the whole Division. For an exercise in obfuscation, Google up "GM Saturn UAW" and see what hits you get. ALL of the first two pages of hits are about union troubles. NONE of those articles by various auto magazines and other interested writers has a single good thing to say about the union OR the "Breakthrough" agreement it signed with GM and the Saturn Division.
The UAW killed Saturn years ago, by destroying the labor-management detente that had built the expensive Spring Hill, TN plant where the cars were originally made. In recent years, the cars were built as orphans in various other GM plants, evidently under the standard UAW labor contract, not under the "visionary" contract that built the Division.
In a strange twist of fate, the entire fate of "New GM" now rests on the creation of a new labor-management detente similar to the one which failed at the Saturn Division. When Barney Frank and Tim Geithner broke up the old GM after rescuing it with taxpayer largesse, they simply handed the majority of the stock in the "New GM" to the UAW. The UAW owns Government Motors now, and is responsible for what happens to it's management direction.
It stands to reason that the UAW could have prevailed on it's members to build the cars at GM plants in a side agreement with Penske, or could have urged other of it's members to build them in a renewal of the detente, at another manufacturer.
But no, the UAW let Saturn die. There was no way that Roger Penske could have pulled off this miracle without the help of the UAW, and as an astute businessman, he must have taken some assurances of the UAW people with him when he signed on to the agreement to buy Saturn.
It's pretty obvious now that those were false assurances.
If I can come up with this tale of perfidy in less than an hour, why couldn't the entire Associated Press do it in the weeks and days which they must have had? (ED. NOTE: The AssPress must have read either my mind or my blog, because they have come out with a more detailed story, but they still pretend the UAW doesn't exist).
The answer, folks, is that the Associated Press is bought and paid for by the Left, and the Left would never allow a story to cast one of it's major players, the UAW, in a bad light. This story couldn't have been written WITHOUT showing the UAW in a bad light, and the AssPress just couldn't pull that trigger, so they lied by omission in their article.