May 06, 2008

Running Amok with numbers

While our attention is focussed on the price of oil and it's refined derivatives, other players in the global market economy have stuck THEIR knives in our backs.

Consider that major brands of soda pop used to sell for (full retail price) $3.60 or so for a rack. On deep discount, usually before various warm-weather holidays, that price would drop to $2.40. Now come the pre-Memorial Day sales and the price has dropped to.....about $3.60 a rack from about $5.20 or so.

I used to drink a lot of branded pop. I swill cheapy stuff now.

Consider that a T-Bone steak used to sell for $5.00/# at a sale. Found any for under $8.00/# recently?

I eat cheaper cuts of beef now.

A battle-pack of South African 7.62 NATO M80 Ball used to cost $28.00 for 140 rounds, about 15 months ago. That same battle pack is about $80 today (and a couple of years older). 9X19 UMC 115-grain ammo was as cheap as $5.99/box of 50 a year ago, now $9.99. .308 hunting loads used to be $13-16 a box of 20, but those same boxes today are creeping up on $40.

I used to toss all my brass. I save every hull now and reload with lead.

I'm sure this is all highly fiskable by an Econ person. So fisk it.

In return for fisking it (which you may do in the comments if you like), all I ask is that you take out the last three check registers from your file cabinet and add up a typical month's bills and cash ATM withdrawals from your checking account, and post them for 15 months ago, 10 months ago, five months ago and this month.

You will have fisked yourself.

You may not call it recession, you may call it something else, or you may persist in saying the economy is fine, but your checkbook won't lie to you.

The (D)onk candidates haven't been talking about the economy much. Come November, they won't have to, it will be the #1 item on ALL voters' minds.

B.O.H.I.C.A.

April 28, 2008

Recession

Recession is an ugly word for politicians, and most of whom can be trusted to not utter it at all. So goes our President Ostrich, blissfully telling us that because indicators x and y are not negative, we're not in recession. Well, a kid in the sixth grade who reads newspapers or watches CNBC or FNN could tell you that the indicators have been "cooked" to the point that we could be in a full-blown Depression and today's indicators wouldn't even have us in Recession yet.

Well, we're in a Recession. How do I know, the one who freely admits to almost flunking bonehead Econ in college?

Warren Buffet says so. In case you don't know him or just got in from Planet Zargon, Warren Buffet is the country's richest man, and got that way by astute investment.

Mr. Buffet says we're in a Recession, so we're in a Recession.

January 26, 2008

Ribbit, Rebate, Rabbit?

While watching the new brocade layer on my family room/kitchen ceiling dry, I have to pause in between cycling my HVAC system between airconditioning and heating modes, so I surf the internet during the pauses.

There are a few economic heavy hitters starting to weigh in on the Bush/Peloser income re-distribution plan "Tax Rebate". More will weigh in as the Congress does their usual thing and loads the plan down to give dollars to every constituency the earmarkers pork-barreling fat cats can think of.

In the world of economics, the hitters don't come much heavier than Dr. William Niskanen, former economic adviser to Ronald Reagan, the last President to be adequately advised on the economy, and the last President to understand free market economics.

In this article, Niskanen says the ribbit makes no sense.

I agree, even though I plan to do my patriotic duty and spend the cash when it gets here, on a new EBR.

Shoot, I feel guilty already! When I buy that gun, I will be going against everything the dot gov wants, because I'll wager that they do not want the gun industry to get ANY of those ribbit bucks.

Too bad we can't keep track of the total of the dollars spent on firearms and ammo by the ribbit recipients.

However, before we get all dreamy here, I think that the whole plan will be aborted when Bernanke et al come to their senses.

I think that the ribbit will rabbit.

January 25, 2008

John Maynard Keynes rides again

John Maynard Keynes, Brit statist and Socialist, is smiling from his grave. Best known for his economic theory which said that funding government to excess was good for the economy, because of government spending's "pump-priming" effects, Keynes would definitely approve of this idiotic deficit-boosting plan to forestall an obvious recession.

It's idiotic because most grade-school kids who have a piggy bank in which they save small change will tell you that this isn't real money the dot-gov is handing out, it's borrowed money. A borrowing crisis is what has set off this financial downturn anyway, and yet the government thinks we can pull out of the downturn with more borrowing?

The plan does several things, but will forever be known for it's worst part, which is the issuance of Federal checks to everyone. These checks won't be "serious" money, as the average Joe or Jill will get three or four hundred bucks, but supposedly it's enough to get us to spend our way out of the recession that you and I know we're in, but none of the econ boys will admit to yet.

In a still-further bit of foolishness, the government will tax you on this borrowed money that they're giving you. Before you've even cashed the check, the government will count those increased taxes as part of a revenue-enhancement that helps pay for giving you the money in the first place.

Of course, a perpetual money-machine is a pipe dream, they don't exist and never did, even when Keynes said so they didn't.

Real wealth is measurable by assessing the market value of things.

I have some real wealth. For example, my 1999 Mazda B2500 pickup is worth maybe $2,000. That's what I could sell it for, if I shined it up and armor-alled the tires like the gypsies do. The used vehicle market is a real market, based ONLY on what the vehicles within it could be sold for. The economy should be based on reality, but it isn't, and time is the reason. If you own General Motors, you don't want to have to sell a factory every time you need to borrow money, so the GM CFO goes to the bank and claims his company is worth x-number of billions of dollars, and the bank looks at his projections of coming sales, and decides to loan him y-number of dollars. This has to be done because physical pieces of commerce are best left in place creating wealth, instead of actually changing hands every time dollars need to be raised.

The problem comes when government thinks it can do the same thing. The government has taxing authority, the ability to skim the profits of business and individuals, and operate itself on those dollars. The Constitution, as amended, gives the government that authority. When Keynes' theories were popular here, up until Reagan, the government developed all sorts of mathematical models (which I could have learned to use but didn't) to predict the output of the economy. The first one was the Gross Domestic Product, the total sum of all the goods and services produced in the country. Then we became more international in our outlook, so we had to separate out the money that US corporations made overseas (because we aren't supposed to tax those profits directly, they get taxed where they are created), and foreign corporations working here made in this country (yes, we have the authority to tax all those profits, but we frequently give that authority away in deals to try to promote more business).

So, over the years, these business and taxing models have gotten to be less and less accurate as predictors of the future state of economies.

Simple is better.

There is one measure of how well any country is doing, and that is how well their currency is accepted for buying things on the international markets. Things like stocks and bonds, and contracts for delivery of things like oil.

We look at the horror that is the oil marketing business and we suffer the pain of watching the interminable rise in the price of petroleum, the most vital commodity in the world behind gold itself.

Mostly, though, we aren't seeing the value of oil rise, actually, we are seeing the value of the dollar fall (oil is measured in dollars per 42-gallon barrel, if you just got here from the planet Cylon). The government is responsible for the fall of the dollar, because just like the bonehead sub-prime mortgage borrowers, it can't pay for the money it prints (borrows) from us citizens.

Just in case you don't believe me, compare two indexes, the price of the aggregate of US stocks known as the Dow Industrials (DJIA) and the price of gold (which is fixed in London, against the prices of the world's currencies). The Dow is about the same as it has been, around $12,300 or so, give or take a few percentage points. Gold, however, has risen in the past few months from the $700s to over $921 today. The value of gold, as I've said here many times before, is a standard, and doesn't change. The prices paid for it in the various currencies of the world changes, and those prices are directly related to the stability of those currencies, or what the gold traders think those currencies will do in the future.

I trust the gold traders. They make few mistakes or bad projections, unlike the dot-gov, which totally failed to predict this recession.

So, what do we do with the comparison of the markets for stocks and gold we just did? We immediately come to the conclusion that false factors are at work in the stock market, and it is currently over-priced, which means it will fall.

My advice? I advise a "flight to quality". Buy oil contracts or gold, gold being the more stable because you have to deal for the oil in dollars at both ends. Just don't think you're rich when gold tops $1,000 as it will do in the coming weeks. You aren't rich, because the dollars you are pricing gold in are falling in value, your gold isn't actually generating more wealth for you. What it is doing is protecting your wealth. The greater percentage of your total wealth you have in gold, the better off you are, protected from your idiotic government which shouldn't be managing your child's piggy bank, let alone most of the available wealth on the planet.

So, this brings us to what we are going to do with our silly little rebate checks. The best thing to do is buy gold bullion. The worst thing to do is spend it on a weekend at the beach or a new I-Pod.

The second best thing is to buy guns and/or ammo, because those will increase in value very quickly, and have the additional potential to make you, as part of a determined citizenry, able to change the direction of the the idiot government which just issued you that phony check.

I love irony.

January 16, 2008

Something is fishy here....

I was up late last night, or early this am, depending on your POV. I was cruising on the 'net and happened across some alarming news that the Hong Kong stock exchange (Hang Seng Index) had tumbled 5.4% and the Tokyo exchange (Nikkei Index) 3.4% When I finally hit the rack at 0530 PST, I was sure I was going to wake up to a worse NYSE disaster than yesterday (DJIA lost 0.6%).

I was wrong. Despite JP Morgan-Chase (HUGE bank group) reporting a severely reduced 4Q dividend after writing down bad loans, and Intel Corp reporting weak sales, and Boeing reporting a delay in shipping the 787 Dreamliner (oh no, not the dreaded Airbus delay disease!), the NYSE seemed to shrug it off, at worst, the DOW down 0.01% as I write.

The market shouldn't be shrugging it off. The economy is in deep doo-doo, if this report is accurate. Isolating the cost of food and fuel in the CPI, the inflation rate for those two items was the worst in 17 years.

I decided to venture the reason why those two items went nuts, and our friendly Dot Gov (the REPUBLICAN-led Dot Gov) is responsible for both.

Fuel: Just a year ago, we were horrified at the idea of $100/barrel oil. Now it's a reality. A year ago, we said that it could only get that high (had been sitting at $55-65 for the previous year) if war with Iran broke out. Well, war with Iran hasn't broken out, and we have $100 oil, because we have let OPEC push us around with production quotas yet again (they've been doing that since the original "oil crisis" of 1973, which wasn't really the "original" one, the Suez Crisis of 1956 was, but we could live on our own production in those days). One of the reasons we entered into war in Iraq and Afghanistan was that that part of the world was too important to let the jihadists muck up. So instead, we mucked up fighting the jihadists. All the worlds' lefties accused us of going to war over oil, which we didn't, but we should have, and now we are paying for not doing that.

Well, we mucked up the war, by not winning it quickly and imposing  order over there, which we could have. That little world uncertainty, added to the  broadening of the petroleum market and the tightening of supply by OPEC, means $100 oil.

Food: The huge jump in the price of food is directly the fault of Bush climbing into bed with the envirowhackos and going whole-hog over Ethanol, which, as I've explained before in these pages, is NOT a scientific solution to dependence on foreign petroleum supplies. By doubling the price of every bushel of corn produced, we have cut our own throats. $3.00/gallon diesel fuel means it costs the ranch to make the ranch produce.

So much for the GOP being the best stewards of the economy. This news just about hands the election to the (D)onks.

If I take a nap now, how long will I have to sleep to wake up in the next "Golden Age" (hint, Eisenhower was President during the last one)?

BTW, in case you wrote this bad economic news off as just more prattle from the 'ol Rivrdog, the afternoon gold fixing in London is $889.75. It was $628 a year ago. Remember that gold is a STANDARD. Like the speed of light, it doesn't change, other things measured against it change. This means that the US dollar is (in the money of last January) worth 41% less today.

And you're not worried? If not, tell me why below in the comments.

Blog powered by TypePad