May 12, 2008

So many rifles....

...too little money.

I'm 64 years old, but I think I just fell in love...

With the Remington Model 7615.

I've shot the 760 in 30-06, a patrol rifle carried in my early days as a Deputy Sheriff. It was a shoulder-pounder, and you mounted that rifle CORRECTLY before each shot or you paid the price in a massive shoulder bruise. Especially since I had a PT requirement in those days, including push-ups, and there was NO PADDING in my shoulders!

Then, some 8 years ago, my late Uncle Alex willed me a 760 in .308. It had a little less of a bite, but my Savage 99E in .308 was the better brush gun, so I sold it.

Now comes temptation. Remington has wisely put the 760 out front again, with a fine rifle in .223 (5.56 NATO). I've resisted the allure of an AR so far, even though as part of the Special Weapons Team of the Sheriff's Office in the 90's, I qualified with one. In fact I don't even own a rifle in our current military caliber. Haven't liked the poodleshooter round much. I do notice that in the obligatory hunting picture in their website, Remington poses a hunter with several poodles coyotes.

The rifle accepts AR magazines, so a 10 or 20 rounder would be perfect for militia duty. I would probably mount a tactical red-dot scope on it, but might opt for a Scout Scope if one could be mounted.

Now, if this rifle came in 7.62X39, taking AK magazines....or maybe 6.8 SPC, getting a bit ahead of the Army as they get ready to modify some M-4's for that caliber...

May 08, 2008

Twi-nite Doubleheader

Arriving at the appointed time (1800 PDT) for my HR-218 qualifications, I found I was at the back of a long line waiting for the opportunity to shoot on a small range.

The Tri-County range complex is a strange place, with lots of little ranges that were borrow pits, as the entire place is a former gravel mine. The Lake Oswego Police Department, which conducts this Qualification for local retired officers (theirs and other local jurisdictions) was assigned a range not capable of taking more than 13 shooters at a time, and about 70 showed up. It seems that most of the geezer cops who came to be qualified disregarded the instruction in the confirmation email which said not to arrive early. Most except myself and 4 others, most of whom I knew from my police career. I got there at 1748, and there was already qualification shooting going on.

So, it turned into a gab-session at the back of the line, and by 2000 hours, we were finally in the paperwork processing part of the drill, which went fast enough, and with a 2028 sunset time staring us in the face, we commenced the first qualification attempt 20 minutes before sunset, in a hole in the ground, on a cloudy evening, with a cold wind blowing.

I had skulled this out beforehand. I intended to shoot in both the revolver and pistol classes, so as to be certified to carry any handgun. My revolver was to be Shorty, my Ruger SP101. It does NOT have night sights, only a two-color, painted-on scheme of my own invention. I shot it first. I passed the qual with 100% in the K-5. Mandatory passing is 100% for all 5 stages. There were about 4 of the group I was in who had to shoot again (do-overs get the range to themselves while re-trying), but they all succeeded the second time, so by five minutes after sunset we were ready for second guns.

I strap on my Kel-Tec P11 9mm, which has a very clear three-dot sight set-up, similar to a Sig-Sauer or Walther P-99. It's even clearer than factory issue, because I over-coated the factory enamel in the dots with "Liquid Paper".

Yep, "White-out" is your buddy on a twilight shoot. I shot a very respectable group averaging 7" over the whole qualification, all stages.

It was not as easy at it sounded, though. On the FIRST round of the FIRST stage, where we run from the 15 yard line to the 12, drop down behind a barricade (55-gallon drum), peek around the barricade, acquire the target and bring it under fire with the strong hand, one round only, I took a bad grip on my pistol while trying to maximize my concealment (which we weren't being evaluated on, but I play by ALL the rules). I got a nasty "slide-bite" on the top of the mid-knuckle thumb of my left hand. I proceeded to the next round, a peek-over the top of the barricade and one shot on the target, then for the third shot, I had to put the gun in my off-hand (again, to maximize the reality of the training, most shooters fire this shot using a strong-hand grip, but you expose most of your body that way), and I fired the final peek-around shot of the stage with blood FLOWING from the wound.

As I finished and holstered, I immediately reached for a "field-dressing", my cleaning rag, a 4"X8" piece of old T-shirt, and I fashioned a bandage and tied it on. The Range Master is watching me with interest now, and I give him a thumbs-up (very visible, with bandaged thumb) and he gives me one back, so I am good to go. I had to adjust the bandage a couple of times during the following stages, but I shot one of my best-ever quals with that little Kel-Tec, now properly named "Slasher".

"Slasher" came equipped with two 10-round magazines, one having the finger-extension on it, and one not. Both are made by Mec-Gar, an Italian firm which makes very good magazines. I was shooting the last round of the last stage, a two-yard quick-draw encounter simulating a field interview gone bad, where we throw our notebook in the opponent's (target's) face as a distraction while drawing and firing a double-tap, then shifting sideways in a ready position to engage again (but not engaging, fight's over). The non-finger-extender equipped mag was in the gun.

The P11 smokestacked on the last round of the double tap. A peculiar kind of smokestack. I did a "tap, rack and go", but (and I spent a half hour with dummy rounds trying to duplicate this last night), somehow, the empty hull got caught in the lips of the magazine, instead of the usual smokestack where it is resting on top of the magazine lips. The next immediate action is a magazine change. Now, the shoot is actually over at that point, but we have not been given the final command ("Holster an empty weapon"), so I'm supposed to have an operational pistol. I then discovered that it's DAMN HARD to get the magazine out of the P11 with a bandaged hand, and no finger-extension to grip. That WILL be remedied.

At the conclusion, the Range Master came over, looked at my target, looked at my hand, and just shook his head and grinned, quipping something to the effect of, "You've been retired HOW long and you STILL take this shit seriously as if you were going out on patrol at midnight?" then, "You don't need EMS for that mangled thumb, do you?"

I thanked the Lieutenant for his concern, and told him I had a first-aid kit in my POV, and would clean it up and apply a proper bandage, and I was going right by Urgent Care on the way home if I needed more help.

I was so cold, and so pumped at having done it RIGHT, that I never noticed the pain until the truck heater had been on for 15 minutes.

April 17, 2008

Swivel Hips and Stepping in the Bucket

No, I am NOT a hitting coach in baseball. The two maladies in the title are known to baseball hitters, the first, swivel hips, being the tendency to let your hips rotate instead of squaring up to the proper hitting stance and letting the hips be a fulcrum against which to lever the shoulders and the bat against the ball. Stepping in the bucket is the failure to keep one's poise in the batter's box during the end of a swing, resulting in the outside foot having to plant away from the box ("in the bucket") to preserve balance. Of course, THAT little problem seriously messes up a swing also.

Okay, Okay, readers ask, but I thought the Rivrdog was going to the pistol range today, not the batting cage or the ball diamond.

Yep, I went to the pistol range, and my former star student, now good enough to coach pistol herself, noted those two problems as I assumed the various combat stances and fired practice stages for the Pistol Qualification Course.

The stepping in the bucket was new to me. I didn't know I was disobeying the both-feet-planted rule of taking a shooting stance, but she noted that after I let off the first shot and re-presented the pistol for more shots, I would rise up on my off-foot and actually pivot it, keeping all my weight on my gun foot.
I have NO idea where I picked up THAT bad habit, but I paid some serious attention to feedback from both my feet to ensure that they were both carrying equal loads after that. My shot group, which had been stringing vertically, right along the spine (not a bad place to hit an opponent, it is totally and immediately disabling to the unarmored enemy), immediately tightened up to about 3-4 inches.The swivel hips were probably the result of standing on uneven ground on the 10 yard firing line, which at Rainier Rod & Gun Club is not level, but slopes down towards the target butts and has depressions in the ground. Consciously shifting my feet to bridge the small depressions caused my hips to steady out.

With the newly re-acquired rock-solid stance, I went to work with my 2" .357, and liking the results, fired five at the head at 30 feet, three of those being minute-of-beezer shots. I'll take a 3/4" group with a two-inch at sunset, yes I will. Almost back to "snubnose sniper" form, I am. I did note that the red paint on the front sight blade on the Ruger SP101 is almost too dark for evening work, though, so THAT will have to be changed before my upcoming twilight shoot.

I need another couple hundred rounds to lock in the new confidence, then I'm ready to go and shoot two first-round possibles in the PQC and RQC for my HR 218 certification.

Excuse me, I'm off to the range........

This is the only shooting match that means anything to me as a participant.

The annual qualification for my HR 218 Retired Police Officers National Carry Card.

Qualifiers shoot at the K-5 zone of a #28 silhouette target, from ranges of 15 down to two yards, from behind barricades, in combat crouches, with normal hand AND off hand unsupported, in timed and rapid fires, and with some cylinder reloading or magazine changes while firing a stage. Qualifiers intending to carry either revolver OR pistol must qualify separately with both. Qualifying will start in the early evening at end in twilight.

OK, sh what, say all you IPSC boys, you're shooting at a target that is actually 9"X20", and that's not a big deal, right?

OK, smartypants, the MINIMUM qualifying score is 100%. Yes, you have to get a perfect score or you DO NOT Qualify. You are allowed a couple of re-shoots if you fail to qualify, but you have to re-shoot the ENTIRE COURSE, not just the stage you missed on.

Does THAT make it a tad more respectable?

Practice today, practice again next week, and then shoot for real 5/8/08.

March 31, 2008

S.H.T.F. must-have item

When we think of S.H.T.F. kits, we tend to think of the three big essentials: defense, food/water and shelter. Well, there are other things equally important. One of them is WORK. No, not driving the Beemer down to your job as IT Manager for WidgetCorp. That job won't continue after S.H.T.F. I mean doing manual work, perhaps as rescue work, shelter erection work, something involving putting a strain on some material to either move it or fix it in place.

That is going to involve rope. Rope is a marvelous invention, but you have to understand it's strength, and not under-apply it, and you have to understand that it must be fastened with knots, of which there are different ones for different jobs.

But, first, there has to be rope. This offer of rope is the best I've seen for a high strength (it's probably about 7,000 to 12,000 pounds tensile strength, with a working (repeatable) load of maybe 3-4000 pounds). You get 162 feet for fifty bucks. If you get some, and decide to cut it into shorter lengths, use a "hot-knife" to cut it, and whip the ends with 25# fishing line according to this diagram. Three-strand rope WILL unravel if not whipped. If you are cutting without a hot-knife, whip twice at the place you want to cut, then cut between the whippings. I finish off the whipping by sealing it with super-glue, which should also be in your S.H.T.F. kit.

Now don't even start with comments about how rope must be in the kit for tidying up those who caused the S.H.T.F. situation in the first place.....

March 17, 2008

NRA FUBAR?

Since education is certainly the NRA's strong suit, what do you suppose this cryptic letter to all 55,000 NRA-certified trainers means?

Dear NRA Trainer:

Due to circumstances beyond NRA's control, a disruption in the availability of all training materials and other NRA products ordered from the NRA Program Materials Center has occurred and may exist for an indefinite period.

We regret that we cannot provide more specific time information. We will provide further information as it becomes available to us. Please be patient. With over 55,000 trainers, we will not be able to personally discuss the status of the situation with you. We fully understand and share your concern, and we regret the inconvenience to you and the NRA.

Sincerely,

Charles H. Mitchell
Manager
NRA Training Department

Here are some guesses: Total training department re-org, without benefit of OJT for the new management team; major shortage of funding caused by you guess (budget redirection, embezzlement, etc come to mind); a lawsuit involving the training division that the NRA expect to lose (as in: being enjoined).

This is bad, very bad. If the NRA can't conduct any of it's superlative training, will someone please tell me what good they are to anyone? Their formerly-adequate system of alerts has fallen into mediocrity or worse, and there are getting quite viral with their schlock sales-of-anything program (see: "Lifelock").

If this isn't a major reverse, the NRA owes it to their membership to explain this cryptic letter, and fast. If you go to this NRA Training website, you get a shorter, but still non-informative version of the letter.

Anyone out there closer to the NRA than the RSO program (me) know anything about this?

February 27, 2008

Range Report - Colt Anaconda & Marlin 1894

Forty-Four Day arrived with sunshine and mild temperatures, and best of all, a DRY RANGE!

At Douglas Ridge Rifle Club, Easy Ed and your blogger had the place to ourselves until the usual benchrest crowd showed up about 10am to shoot their 3/8" groups.

We both brought .44 Magnums: my new Colt Anaconda and Marlin 1894, both in the manly HEROIC .44 Remington Magnum caliber, and Easy Ed brought a venerable Ruger Super Blackhawk, in the same heroic caliber.

I proceeded to sight in the 1894. It has enough felt recoil to make sure you mount it to the shoulder properly. It also has cheapo buckhorn open sights, which were off enough to require a few taps for windage adjustment, and running the sight down to the barrel for elevation, and then it STILL shot 6" high at 25 yards and 20" high at 100. Here's the 100-yard target:

0227081024

First, the carbine shoots high, REALLY high. The nice head shot group was achieved by sighting on the x-ring! There were two in the white to the left that I jerked. Hmmmm. Disregard the center-of mass grouping for now.

Now, consider this 25-yard target. It is the 9-and better from this same silhouette target, traced on butcher paper (for about a dime a sheet!):

0227081022

OK, I had just fired up the Anaconda, and was trying to get my head involved in mastering the VERY SHARP recoil and huge flash from full-house Remington 180-gr JSP. I also had to set the sights (very easy, they are click adjustable). So, I booted a couple on the left side, plus the 10-o'clocker at 2", but noted with satisfaction that the elevation was right on. I over-corrected windage and put on the two most right-hand rounds and the 12:30 at 5", then adjusted again, and got the 11:30 hits (keyhole!). Then I got cocky, and left the sitting rested position and took a standing Weaver stance, got the center-dot X, the two more in the 2" red paster out at 9, and the keyhole pair 2" at 11 o'clock. That felt pretty good, but my wrist was feeling abused, so I put on a long-gantlet glove and taped my wrist over the glove. I decided to try it at 100 yards. OPEN SIGHTS ON THIS REVOLVER, MR. C:

Refer back to the first photo. I had 8 rounds left in the box, and went back to the rested position, concentrating on sight picture and breath control, single action (did I mention that the single action on this revolver is the crispest thing I have let off since my college days with an Anschutz target rifle?). Easy Ed was spotting, and he called an eight at 8, then a 10 at 6, then a dead-X! He looked at me kinda strange, but I kept shooting, spoiled it with the two in the white off the right shoulder, then concentrated, and got the nine at 7:30, the eight at 6 and the 10 at 12:00. Then we reminisced about the year (when were were Deputies) that the brass hats decided it would be good to try to shoot with our revolvers at 100 yards. I demonstrated proficiency then, but few others did (Easy Ed did).

I asked Easy Ed if he thought he could do as well with his Blackhawk, and he looked like he had his doubts, but bent to the challenge (Oregon State University Varsity Rifle Team). The target below has unpasted holes. They are his. I'd say he won the match, on group size, but I would have won it scoring. That dead-X is mine, the paster fell off.

0227081105a_2

Coupla diabetic old geezers who surprised each other. I am delighted with the Anaconda results (considering it's a 4"), but I think I need something better to sight with on the Marlin. I have XS Ghost-Ring sights with a white-post front on my other Marlin 1894, a .357 ("Snuffy"). I will try to find someone with a set of Williams Fire Sights to try out their carbine, but I know I'll do OK with the XS.

OTOH, maybe it's time for a reflex, but DAMN, I could still see to shoot over the iron today!

February 21, 2008

Gee, Whiz

Gee, whiz (cue the music from "2001, A Space Odyssey")

I don't think I need one, but it must scare the bejesus out of the gun banners to think that an assault weapon can be made to NOT look evil, but plain and un-assuming instead.

BTW, I have no idea how much this weapon would sell for, but I do know that Kel-Tec's line of foldable weaponry sells for a very reasonable sum, so reasonable, in fact, that your Ordinary Joe might have several (to disperse, naturally). Heh!

H/T to the EllTee
 
 

February 19, 2008

Are you ready for Militia duty?

How fast we are heading for a severe breakdown in civil order in this nation is debatable. The fact that we ARE headed in that direction is NOT debatable.

The Founders were smart enough to figure out that such a breakdown was possible, and they examined all the angles it might come from, and they created the Second Amendment as a civil right so that citizens of their new Nation might be better prepared to handle the troubles ahead.

The Founders looked at three threats. They were, in ascending order of importance, civil riot, Indian fighting (on the frontiers) and a Federal Government gone awry.

The Founders' solution to all three was Militia. The CURRENT solution to the two remaining threats (Indians fighting is a thing of the past, even if some like Russell Means want to keep it alive) is Militia.

Let's see how you might prepare yourself for Militia duty. I will probably write several posts on this subject, and they will be cross-linked. They will also be linked to posts which ran from July 7, 2005 to July 22, 2005 which I wrote in my dormant, but still available blog Paratus. To read them, go to the blog, drill down on the right side to "Archives", click on the word "Archives", and then highlight July 2005 and scroll through that month until you get to July 7, then scroll upwards to see the rest of the series.

Some of the following material is already covered over in those Paratus posts, but the only things which have changed in the last three years are ammo and gun prices (both have gone up, but ammo has almost doubled in that time).

I'm going to discuss weapons first, because they are the most likely thing to be embargoed by a government gone bad (there are constant attempts to do that, if you just landed from the off-Earth and have tapped into our rudimentary communications network, the Internet). Weapons are also the most expensive of the Militia equipment to acquire and train in the use of, and the most time-consuming. They are 80% of the total concept of citizen responsibility for preservation of the Nation and it's Constitution.

To look at weapons, we have to look at how they are used, so as to get an idea of what weapons a Militia needs.

Weapons are used according to their capabilities to effectively bridge the distance between the shooter and the target. Note the emphasis on the word "effectively". It's there for a reason, because firearms for individual use come in three effectiveness levels: handguns, carbines and battle rifles. Shotguns fits somewhere in between handguns and carbines, as to range.

Those three ranges are: handguns, 0-5 yards/meters; carbines, 0-100 yards/meters; battle rifles, 0-700 yards/meters. A militia fire team should have all three levels of firearms available, in military calibers, in some combination. A fire team of, say, five members might have 3 with handguns (most useful in house searches/clearings and roadblock work), 3 carbines or shotguns and 2 battle rifles. In the field, the militia member must carry one battle-day's supply of ammunition. for the pistol, that is assumed to be about 30 rounds, for the carbine, 100-120 and for the battle rifle, 100-120. Practically, more can be carried, but since the handguns is only going to be used as a desperation weapon in brief encounters at close range, 3 magazines full of ammo is all that's practical for one day. The carbine might be used for suppressive/harassing firing, so a minimum of 100 rounds is required, and ditto the battle rifle.

The shotgun has very heavy ammo, and 100 rounds is a heavy load, and it is used in desperation, close-quarter fighting, so that 50 rounds is probably OK.

The carbines and battle rifles may be semi-automatic or they may be manual loading. It doesn't matter, for when the leader calls for harassing fire, the objective is to get a lot of rounds on the target quickly. If a manual loading rifle is carried, the rifle operator must be able to load and fire quickly.

Pistol-caliber carbines. I have several combinations of pistols, and the same caliber of carbine. This allows the militia member to carry only one caliber of ammunition while being armed with weapons suitable for close-in work and for medium-distance work, and in a pinch, the member may arm an unarmed person who comes into the fight on the militia's side.

An excellent combination would be a .357 Magnum caliber revolver with a 4 or 6 inch barrel and a Marlin Model 1894 carbine of the same caliber. A bit beefier would be a .44 Magnum revolver and a Marlin carbine of the same caliber. This caliber in a carbine is lethal out to 500 yards/meters, but the bullet drop is such that nothing much past 300 yards/meters is effective. You might hit something holding over 5 feet (300 yard bullet drop), but your sights aren't made for holding over 18 feet (500 yard bullet drop).

There are semi-automatic pistols which have companion carbines also. You can pair Glock, Smith and Wesson, 1911A1 and some others with various carbines. The Kel-Tec Sub-Rifle 2000 is a carbine that takes the pistol's magazines. The most effective caliber is .40 S&W, but this carbine ranges only to 100 yards/meters, and anything over that will require excessive hold-over. The upside of these weapons is their weight, only 4#. That means you can carry much more ammo.

The battle-rifle is not meant to be light weight, most weighing 9# and up. They are generally some caliber of 7.62mm, such as 7.62 NATO (highly recommended, since it is the NATO heavy-rifle caliber), or 7.62X54 Russian (the WW2 Soviet blot-action rifles or the more modern RPK semi-auto), and the .303 British (the variants of the Enfield WW1 and WW2 rifles). The 8X57 is the old Nazi caliber, and there are plenty of those old Mausers around, and for the time being, plenty of the ammo, as the former East Bloc nations dump their supplies on the market (and while the Federal Government still allows imports of it).

The semi-auto battle rifles are the best. In 7.62 NATO, the CETME (Spanish) Model B (as imported and modified by Century Arms) is plentiful and reliable, and the H&K 91 and clones (PTR-91) are similar in function and better-built (but twice as expensive). The King of these pre-Stoner 7.62 autoloaders is the M14 and clones (Springfield M1A, Taiwan Type 57). There is an AR-type which shoots the 7.62 NATO, the AR-180, and it is a fine rifle, but well over $1,000. Finally, there is the FN-FAL, still in service in many armies. Having one of the above battle rifles means that you are the fire team's long-range member, and you need to be in shape to haul your 13-15# rifle (yes, it will weigh that much with bipod and scope), and 20-25# of ammo in 20-round magazines.

The militia member might show up for muster with a hunting rifle. Those who do will probably be relegated to duty not likely to involve volume-firing, because they probably won't have much ammo (most hunters don't have more than 40 to 60 rounds of ammo for their rifles), and by law, the weapons can't hold more than 5 rounds, and can't be loaded with stripper-clips, meaning reloading another 5 rounds takes a half-minute as opposed to 2-3 seconds for a magazine change. As a militia member, if you don't have a military weapon to muster with, bring a repeating shotgun, which will be more useful anyway than a scoped bolt-action rifle meant to kill elk at long range. If you are really proficient with such a hunting rifle, you might be pressed into sniper duty, but you'd better know military sniping doctrine, and most hunters don't. If you only have one long gun, bring it (except no .22 rimfire rifles).

In following posts, we will look at how the Militia will fight, what types of missions it will have, and what might become of it politically.

Stay tuned!

February 17, 2008

The Widow's Web

Yes, that network functions. Recently, the Chief RSO in my gun club died after a long battle with cancer. He was a USMC veteran, a no-nonsense kind of guy.

This past week, the word got out that in transitioning to a life without her husband, his widow had run into some financial difficulties.

The new Chief RSO then put out a call for the club to buy all the guns belonging to the late CRSO. They are mostly gone now, and the widow is well again. These guns were NOT given away, but a worthy cause is just that, and must be supported. My wife understood that, and my project THIS WEEK is to write her a list of everything in my safe and what she should sell it for.

My contribution to this was to purchase a LARGE CALIBER revolver. It is such a monster, I am still trying to get my mind around shooting it with full-house ammo, because it is a "guide" model with a short 4" barrel, and I expect it will BARK as well as BITE. I think I will start with .44 Specials (thx for the clue, EllTee).

Colt_anaconda_003

Of course, in my world, weapons exist for battle, and handguns are NOT proper battle weapons, no matter the caliber. "A handgun is carried so you can shoot your way to your LONG gun and finish the gunfight on YOUR terms." One forgets THAT little ditty at one's peril.

Long-time readers will know that I like to pair a handgun and a carbine of the same caliber. I have 4 such pairings (.357, 9mm, .40S&W and .45ACP) and this will be the fifth in my collection.

How about a little help here, readers? If you had this short-nose hogleg, what carbine would YOU pair it with?

Blog powered by TypePad