....but there's purpose in her indecision. She's simply waiting for the game to get a little farther along, so she gets a better idea of where she needs to spend her money.
Punditry: she won't spend much of it fighting Barak Obama. The shavetail Senator is too inexperienced for the job, and a recent poll shows that about three quarters of the US voting public recognizes that fact. His campaign will be a flash in the pan. He will probably get some votes in NH and IA, and some of those votes may very well be (D)emocratic anti-Hillary votes. If there are enough of them, Hillary will, after she wins the two primaries, offer Barak the Veep slot.
Be worried about that, very worried. Such a move will suck in a LOT of sycophantic Lefty voters, maybe even energize the ones that didn't vote in the last two elections.
As to the actual governance potential of the pair: in a word, Socialism.
First there will be Hillary, then there will be the barricades. The two are inexorably linked.
A cankled basilisk and a muslim. How could it get any better? oh, yeah, Nancy Pelosi as secretary of defense.
Posted by: og | December 12, 2006 at 03:37
I hope she runs.
I'll vote for her for the same reason I voted for Jorge Arbusto. I thought he'd screw the system better than Kerry; having a Republican congress to pass a bunch of crap and not vetoing a single bill in his first 4 years. Damn if he didn't succeed in exceeding my expectations! The only bill he's ever vetoed was about stem cells. What a crock of sh*t! What a liberal piece of crap he really is?! Heh!
Go Hitlary! Damn the torpedos full steam ahead!
The sooner the system crashes the better. It can only be rebuilt when it's completely rubblized. Democracy is a sham. Voting is a sham.
Universal suffrage is inversely proportional to universal liberty.
Burn, baby. Burn!
Posted by: anonymous | December 11, 2006 at 20:47