« The politics of the lower Columbia River | Main | I'll join the Paulistas on this one... »

July 06, 2011

Comments

Jim

You nailed it in one, Dawg.

If they'd gone for Negligent Homicide, based soley on circumstial, and not (much) physical evidence, they'd have got her.


Jim
Sunk New Dawn
Galveston, TX

Fred

My generation would describe her as a slut. Being a slut is not a crime. The jury spoke and that should be the end of the discussion.

Fred

Justthisguy

Yup. I bumped into two women discussing it outside the Publix, yesterday. After one left, I engaged the other in conversation. She was of the "They have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt" persuasion, as am I. Even if she didn't do it, she sure was a cold-hearted bitch going out partying when her 2-year-old kid was missing.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Categories

Blog powered by Typepad