Nom de plume: Rivrdog

Dem/Commies eating their own

New Jersey Senior Senator, Bob Menendez (D), and his wife, Nadine, have been indicted on a five-count New York Federal indictment of bribery and corruption, apparently stemming from him becoming an agent of the Islamic Egyptian Republic.

No tears here. Menendez is a rabid anti-rights pol known for attacking and subverting the Second Amendment. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Now we get to see how the Democrats react, especially how swiftly they act to remove him from the Senate foreign Relations committee, where he is now Chair.

This is a bad one for the Dem/Commies, and it will call for a prompt distraction. That could be some sort of attack on Russia, I notice that their Black Sea Navy HQ was severely damaged in a fire...

A coat turns

Liberty Safe co. Read about it here.

A very good course to take

Day before yesterday, I took a course to qualify for Idaho's "Enhanced Concealed Weapons" permit.

Idaho is Constitutional Carry now, has been for years, but that's good only for Idaho Citizens who carry in Idaho. I am an Idaho citizen new, have been for 3 years. By getting the Enhanced card, I can now be treated, for concealed carry purposes, in almost every other State which issues permits to their citizens, 39 or 40 of them.

Idaho is very protective of the R2KBA. We are considered the best and most protective State for this purpose of all 50. Blue States hate Idaho for this reason, because it isn't all empty talk. Folks who come to Idaho for anti-R2KBA reason gun-grabs, for example, can and wiill be ARRESTED, since there is a CRIMINAL charge for those who act or conspire against the rights of Idaho citizens. Here's an example, here's another example, in the cases of an Idaho citizen using deadly force in  Idaho. Those are slides from GemState's course, and it's from the part of the course which was presented by a Kootenai County Deputy District Attorney. Note that the citizen is PRESUMED to have acted lawfully!

Idaho has both Stand Your Ground laws and No Duty to Retreat laws.

I saved what should have been first for my killer finish, though. Idaho's very definition of the R2KBA. Note that "infringed" as stated in the Federal 2A is changed to "abridged". Guess why? Commies all over the US of A have been suing for 30-40 years to ESTABLISH INFRINGEMENTS against the Federal R2KBA. That can't happen here, thanks to the use of "abridged", the common meaning of which is "made smaller".

Beto gets the Bum's Rush

Beto the Burglar, perennial unsuccessful candidate for TX Governor, crashed TX Gov. Abbott's presser on the Uvalde mass murder, and got the heave-ho. Good!

No Obama peeps will ever see Prison

Don't make too big a deal out of USAG Barr announcing that he has a "criminal" investigation going vs. the Obama/NWO collaborators.

 

It won't mean a thing if it ain't got that ZING! For there to be justice served, President Trump has to harden his heart.

 

There's a Trump-wall there now, just like President Jerry Ford faced with Tricky Dick Nixon, and Trump will do the same thing as Ford did...pardon Obummer almost as soon as an indictment comes down or even before it when it becomes obvious that he WILL be indicted.

 

Of course, that would collapse the cases against the other major players. The end result will be that NOT ONE of the Obama/NWO collaborators does a day in prison.

 

Sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings here, but your President has already showed this tendency, with the last few mass shootings, by saying that he felt gun ownership restrictions were okay to prevent further carnage, that AFTER he had stood on stage with Wayne LaPierre at NRA-Con and declared solidarity to protect the 2A against further Infringements.

 

He will be all about "Healing the Nation's divide" when it's Obama's turn to be indicted. Not only that, I don't think he will even ask/require Obama to apologize publicly, so Obama will walk, head high, and nothing will change, the "Resistance" will go forward, even as Trump wins re-election.

 

I hope my readers can see this. Hit pause on your "Trump-tightness" for a moment, and consider the REALPOLITIK involved. How often has Trump actually swung his Hammer except on Trade, and even with that, he's ready to wuss out with USMCA, a NWO Trade plan if there ever was one.

 

Nope, we elected Mister Nice Guy. WE can appreciate him for this quality, but the Left sure won't.

Wapato Jail, the end

Twenty-plus years ago, a $58 million bond was floated to built a new jail for Multnomah county, which I worked for as a Deputy Sheriff at the time. The big jail was built, on industrial land out on the North Peninsula of Portland, but it never opened. Instead, the anti-police (communist) County Government started restricting the Sheriff's number of jail beds.

The Wapato jail became a surplus property, and was eventually sold, and all 13 acres of industrial land it sat on, to the scrap-steel baron of Portland, Jordan Schnitzer, for only $5 million. During the political fooferaw over selling the perfectly-good facility, it was suggested that for a resonable sum, that Jail could be converted into a "homeless shelter". Of course it could! It has a huge kitchen to feed the Homeless Horde, rooms to give them classes in and many dormitories easily converted to sleeping areas. It had a sizeable Infirmary for medical treatment, too. The perfect Homeless shelter, so why wasn't it done?

Enter the emotions the liberloons are well-noted for. We began to hear passionate speeches about hurting the FEELINGS of the Homeless Horde, about how ISOLATED the facility was...

WAIT! Isolated, IS the key this facility wasn't re-pourposed. Read on, my liberty-loving friends...

Those fine folks of PDX don't understand the political motivation of Madam Deborah Kafoury, or they wouldn't be puzzled. Multnomah County Commission leader Kafoury is politically VERY far left. Too far left to be called a traditional liberal, even.

Madam Kafoury is a Socialist, and since she wields her power by fiat, not consent, that makes her a communist. Not a "big-C" communist, she's a snake and won't admit her actual leanings, but a communist nevertheless.

What class of people do communists HAVE to convert to their thinking if communism is to succeed?

Right, the proletariat, the middle class. How do you control the middle class if you are a communist? By taking things away from them: you take away their money by over-taxation, you take away their guns, their property rights, but above all, you must take away their SENSE OF SECURITY! Deborah Kafoury has been at the forefront of Multnomah County's efforts to remove all these middle-class values.

Have you figured out WHY there are so many "homeless" on the street? Over 80% of them have serious mental deficiencies, need STRUCTURE in their lives, but the commies refuse that service to these unfortunates. Why?

Because the Homeless Hordes are communist SOLDIERS, that's why. Their very disorderly existance among the orderly middle class creates that INSECURITY that Madam Kafoury needs to perfect her plan to put the liberty-minded middle class under her commie thumb. Have you ever asked yourself WHY the government tolerates the whacko disorder of the "homeless" in the first place? WHY that government, which has no problem projecting all manner of CONTROL onto the middle class, can't seem to project ANY control onto the "homeless"?

It's because these thousands of crazies infesting our otherwise quiet and stable neighborhoods in Portland are there for a REASON, and that reason is to constantly conflict with we, the residents of those neighborhoods. That constant conflict we are forced into destroys our sense of security, and that is exactly what Madam Kafoury wants. With our security destroyed, Madam Kafoury can then exert control over us to "give us back our security".

No, had Wapato been converted to a homeless shelter/treatment center, it would have taken in up to 2,000 of these crazies and started giving them a normal life, guiding them on their path to a middle-class existance. That's a sizeable fraction of the homeless horde in our area. That would be the very antithesis of what Madam Kafoury wants, so it won't be done, and instead, the junk-baron Jordan Schnitzer will soon have his warehouse to make money with.

You might wonder why that jail was built in the first place. That's a story for another day, but meanwhile, look up the "broken window theory". More on this later.

Marxism 102, short course

Election 2020, Marxism on display. I give you "Marxism 102" to help you sort it all out.

 

There are two kinds of Marxism in the world today: Classic (Maoist) Marxism and Oligarchical Marxism, which we could call "Modern Marxism", I suppose.

 

Classical Marxism, the Marxism of Che Guevara, the Sandinistas, Mao in China, Nikita Kruschev, is all about "we are going to FORCE Socialism on you, and no, we don't care where the necessary money comes from, we'll tax at 100% to pay for it." In other words, with Classical Marxism, there is no wiggle room, no one is allowed to be rich except the State.

 

In Oligarchical Marxism, the Marxist dictator (the Oligarch) ALLOWS some of the benefits of Capitalism: you CAN accumulate $$$ to a degree, also, consumer goods past the bare necessities of life ARE allowed. The State still controls most everything, such as banking, education, etc, but to the slaves laboring for the dictator, it ALMOST seems like freedom. This is the Marxism of Vlady Putin in Russia, of Xi JinPing in China.

 

Application time. Hop back into our borders (everyone else wants to!) and let's look at what Marxism HERE feels like. We have Election 2020 coming up, with our Soft-Capitalist President running against a bunch of Marxists. BTW, we retired an Oligarchical Marxist (Obama) when we elected Trump. Trump now faces the (whoever) Marxist (fill in the name) for election in 57 weeks. Trump campaigns on his Capitalist successes, and the Marxists are all campaigning on THEIR plans to destroy those successes and put Marxism in place of them.

 

All of the high-ranking Democrat contenders are Classical Marxists except Biden, who would be an Obama-style Oligarchical Communist, but he will go away quickly now because he couldn't zip his lip and boasted about his oligarchy on video. Oligarchy is still frowned upon in America.

 

Bernie, Harris, Warren are the front-runners left, and they ALL have spouted Classical Marxist lines of destroying business and industry by Nationalizing it, financing Statism by doubling taxes (or more than doubling, if you do the required math). Of course, removal of Civil Right is a theme all three follow, also: you can't have that pesky R2KBA and that pesky Free Speech undercutting Marxist power, can you?

 

Nope, the Democrats have seen and felt just how fast Marxism can be reversed with a Capitalist at the helm, so now they abandon their gradualism approach to Marxism and go Full-Frontal Communist.

 

The D-Rats will lose next November, and Trump will be re-elected, perhaps even changing the House back to GOPe control in the process. Communists ALWAYS lose elections when they have to play by Freedom's rules, but they have a Plan for that, also: It's called Revolution, the bloodier, the better.

 

When Trump wins, or maybe even before that if the polling shows him to be unbeatable by September or October next year, USA's streets will run in blood. That's sad, but necessary, because the Final Lesson of my Marxism 102 course (this will be on the Test) is that old truism that Marxism can be VOTED in, but it can only be DRIVEN out, by force of arms.

 

You know what, students? The Communists think the same way about Marxism, and we Liberty-loving types have backed the commies into a corner now, so yes, people, you WILL get to use those #TenMillionRifles in anger...

The R2KBA, and why there will be WAR to protect it

I get up, trot down the companionway to the Mess Deck, find da wiff asleep in front of Misogynist-NBC. A headline blares: "Trump finds big mental health problem in gun violence". While I'm pouring a BIG cuppa Joe (with her, if the day starts with MSNBC, it's gonna be a LONG day for me, need BIG coffee), the femolly mouthmessers start talking Backgroud Checks which are Registration (yes, the Left now admits that Registration is a goal, presumably on the road to Prohibition and Confiscation).

 

I take the first sip of the hot coffee, and the "scales fall from my eyes" (Acts 9: 1-22). Why YES, they probably HAVE cited the Trumpster correctly for once. There are ONLY three mentally healthy cases for gun violence: self-defense from lethal attack, organized warfare, and violence committed on food animals, i.e. Bambi. All other violent uses for firearms are mental aberrations, and should be prohibited, but WAIT, there's more.

 

Mentally aberrant gun violence IS already prohibited, in fact, in most places, you may not even fire your gun except for one of the three above cases or upon an organized shooting range. Can't fire it, it harms no one, right?

 

WRONG! The very EXISTENCE of guns is violent, claim the gun-grabbers, because the FACT of a gun's existence EQUATES to violence, in their not-so-humble opinions. It is MIND-VIOLENCE, or terror that they describe. MY guns cause them to be terrorized. Because.

 

Summing up the "Gun-Grabber Philosophy", we find that:

1. All guns are evil, all the time, PERIOD.

2. All guns WILL be FOREVER evil, no good can ever come from a gun.

3. By extension, all those possessing or bearing arms are EVIL, so it's logical to pre-empt their EVIL by restraining them.

 

My friends, I try to live my life appreciating, learning and practicing LOGIC, which is the DEFINED "normal" mental state of mind. The ILLOGIC presented by the anti-gun people is astounding in it's ABNORMALITY, as is the potential for terrorism on the part of the gun-grabbers towards a significant part of our USA's population (the gun-owners).

 

Far from PREVENTING gun-violence, the gun-grabbers actually PROMOTE it by attempting to overturn our God-Given and Constitution-encoded Civil Rights.

 

Sadly, this leaves us only one choice, if the Left manages to convince a fairly decent President Trump to encode more gun-banning even before the Left has a political right (gets elected) to do that.

 

That choice is to declare organized warfare upon the gun-grabbers, to protect our Constitution and it's orderly society from their planned (and now OPERATIONAL) anarchy and disorder.

 

Desist, gun-grabbers, or suffer the consequences of the prevention of your intended destruction of my country. I'm SWORN, on an Oath backed with my very blood, to prevent what you plan for and now show you intend to do to my country.

 

I am sworn to war with the gun-grabbers, and so is every other Veteran. We ARE the #TenMillionRifles.

Gun control in World History

Now that the Democrat Marxist Party has decided it's now or never to toss our Constitution, their choice to do that is Gun Control, and within that choice, the Red Flag Law (ERPO). ERPO is nothing less that changing the very definition of gun ownership to community-based gun ownership. There history here, so let's look at it.

BTW, history repeats itself because few people are smart enough to develop new ideas.  Keep THAT nugget in mind, it's vital here.

 

Case in point: gun control. It was started by Statists, who even then had a vision of Marxist world domination (See the rapid spread of the 1917 Red October Revolution from Russia to all over Europe).

 

That Revolution succeeded, put Marxists in power in a large, but poorly-organized country, Russia. Marxists showed how good they were in organizing a huge new Statist government to run their huge country.

 

The first thing Russia did was disarm their population, to prevent a counter-revolution. Notice that is exactly opposite to what OUR Founders did after winning our Revolution against the British? We insisted that our countrymen be armed!

 

Along came the Great Depression, which Wall Street Investment bankers started because they were greedy (See: Goldman, Sachs and their "margin buying" of equities). During the Great Depression, robber-gangs arose and preyed on the banks, so reviled because they were blamed for the Depression, and therefore easy targets: who gave a rip if a bank was robbed?

 

In the depths of our Depression, we stupidly elected a free-spending liberal President, FDR. He WAS a smart guy, and looked around to find the support for his liberal Administration, one well Left of anyone else's so far in our history.

 

FDR looked at Russia, saw the organization, the determination to succeed of the Soviets (he ignored the misery the Soviets were causing). He looked at Germany, the failed Weimar Republic there just being replaced by the National Socialist Party, with Hitler being appointed Chancellor in late October of 1933.

 

As FDR looked at both examples, one thing jumped off the pages at him: gun control. Along with jawboning some hope back into the USA, FDR decided to do Gun Control, since he had a ready excuse: the robber-gangs. His idea worked, and the track was laid for the Left to ride the Gun Control Train all the way to NOW.

 

The Gun Control Express has FOREVER been the mode of Liberals showing their "decisiveness". They're still at it.

 

Now, the end of the Gun Control tracks is in sight, though. There is no more railroad to the future for the Left, and they have determined to kill the 1A, the 2A and the 4A with one fell swoop, so they advocate community-approved gun ownership be the model for the 2A. If ALL your family and neighbors approve, you may own guns, but if even ONE objects, your guns are taken away. That's the Red Flag Law*.

 

People, we stop Marxism in it's tracks, NOW, or it WILL swallow us up, in months, not years or decades. If we DON'T stop Marxism now, our Constitutional Republic is dead. The first few Amendments of the Bill of Rights IS the Bill of Rights, and the Bill of Rights IS our Constitution, all else which follows is simple process.

 

When we lose the Bill of Rights, we have lost the United States of America.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

*I wanted to post a straight legal definition of Red Flag, but after three searches, I can't find one which is NOT ublished by anti-2A advocates.

The USA vs the New World Order

(Same old conflict, different era)

Our Federal Constitution is anti-New World Order. By DESIGN.

 

When our Constitution was promulgated, there WAS a New World Order, the British Empire. Their Navy ruled the world's seas, their armies vanquished all they faced. It was His Majesty's Way or no way at all.

 

The Founders rejected the hegemony of the British Empire, formed a SEPARATE government with ELECTED, not ENTITLED leaders, and fought the King's armies to a standstill and ultimate victory at Yorktown.

 

The Founders did one more thing though. Knowing that Royalist feelings still ran high on these shores, and deducing that their new Popular government would eventually have to face Royalists again, the Founders gave that new American population the right to possess arms for DEFENSE AGAINST GOVERNMENT, should our Government try to go back to Royalism (the NWO).

 

The Second Amendment to the Constitution is NOT an anti-crime law, crime as we know it today was unknown in the Founders' day. The 2A was a check on the power of the Government, purely and simply. If that Government caved to the NWO, it was to be REMOVED. As such a bulwark, it was VERY anti-New World Order.

 

It still IS anti-NWO, and THAT is why the NWO, through all their proxies (D-Rats, Antifa, global Marxism in general), CONSTANTLY tries to weaken and remove the 2A.

 

This is just my opinion, but I do not believe we have budged the NWO on their opposition to the 2A at all. They will keep trying to remove it and grab all our guns, because they KNOW that they can't take over in this Nation until they do. Furthermore, following my logic here, the ONLY way the NWO will ever be defeated is like it was 241 years ago, on the field of battle.

 

Sorry to burst your bubble(s), but there is NO peaceful way out of this. We either face the NWO and defeat them utterly, or we accept them as our lords and masters and give up all our freedoms.

 

There is no middle ground that will work for us. It's us or them.

 

Shields up, double-front! We're going in!

JPFO strikes out on gun control

It's Thursday, and a usual ally in the gun-control fight just tripped on their Richard, and since you HAVE and WILL hear this wrongful message elsewhere, I present it now.

In this article, JPFO fails by falling into a gun-controller's trap, even while trying to beat down that trap. BTW, Jews for Protection of Firearms Ownership is a FAR better advocate for the freedom to K&BA than the NRA. Let's look at their FUBAR, though.

Sorry JPFO, in YOUR dreams, it might be enough to say gun control of AR-15s fails because it doesn't accurately describe "assault rifles", and you are TECHNICALLY correct, but that doesn't get it in this fight, does it? It's a sound-bite fight, isn't it, JPFO?

 

Want to knock out the "assault rifle" canard with one punch, JPFO?

 

Simply point out that "bearing arms" was meant by the Founders as a general statement. In that day, "bearing arms" meant bringing the same weapons to the fight as the enemy did.

 

The "enemy" in the Founders' day wasn't street punks on dope, it was GOVERNMENT, which could and did buy all the latest MILITARY weapons, just as they do today. Smarter thinkers than you, JPFO, have suggested that if there was ANY limit on "arms" in "bearing arms", it would be that the arms mentioned were INFANTRY weapons.

 

Yes, Infantry Weapons of today include select-fire (full-auto capable) rifles, mortars, belt-fed full-auto machine guns and grenades, so the NFA-34 is un-Constitutional on it's face, as I'm sure was pointed out back when FDR rammed it through Congress, dancing in the blood of the victims of tommy-gun armed gangsters such as John Dillinger and Ma Barker, Pretty Boy Floyd and Al Capone.

 

Yes, blood-dancing for Gun Control isn't a new tactic, either.

 

On average, JPFO, you do a good job, but getting sucked into the Kamel-Toe's gun-hate belies that. Get smarter on this issue, unless you want to be the NRA, and God help you if you DO want that, Jehovah won't help you.