The John F***ing Kerry foot-swallowing act brings it into focus: how could the braintrust of the RNC have let the the libtard wing of the (D)emocrat party get away with hiding, and especially hiding their agenda?
I have a bad feeling about the imminent election. Come January, I think we're going to have Speaker Pelosi, with a razor-thin majority, try to ram a large dose of socialism down our throats.
Hopefully, the Senate, which should wind up with a razor-thin GOP majority, will rebuff her efforts, and GWB, with veto pen in hand, will be there to clean up any socialist cripples that manage to sneak through, INCLUDING EACH AND EVERY GUN CONTROL ISSUE PELOSI FIELDS, AND SHE WILL FIELD A SLEW OF THEM!
Watch this page next week for your instructions on how to stay ahead of the gun-grabbers, who, but this time next week, will likely feel VERY empowered to do their mischief.
All the warnings aside, the GOP has done a TERRIBLE job of countering the say-nothing call of the (D)onks for "change in Iraq".
What change?
WHAT CHANGE?
In my political book, if you, as a politician, call for change, the next words out of your piehole ought to be the plan for change. The (D)onks don't HAVE a plan for change. Sure, a few pacifist lefty members of Congress do: get the hell out, we don't need no War On Terror, but other than that idiotic "plan", there is nothing.
Let it never be said that I'm unwilling to provide guidance to the Loyal Opposition, so, without further ado, here's a plan for you, putative Speaker Pelosi:
1. The US takes a VERY FIRM position, immediately, on the Shiite PM, Nouri al-Maliki, who is rapidly turning the new "democracy" into a Islamic (Shiite) fiefdom of Iran. We REQUIRE him, on pain of immediately taking INDEPENDENT military action against Tater, to sever all ties with Moqtada al-Sadr, who is nothing more than a puppet of Iran, nor has he and his Maadi Army ever been anything else.
2. The US immediately puts pressure on al-Maliki to draw plans for a partition of Iraq into Sunni, Kurdish and Shiite sub-nations. Sorry Mr. Bush, they all just CAN'T get along over there, and we have to realize it. We insist on military basing rights in each of the three sub-nations. Permanent basing rights. We are going to need them, soon.
3. After the Pentagon establishes what the permanent-party basing forces should be, we post a timetable to withdraw troops, according to strength and logistics guidelines, not John Mutha's Murtha's. We follow that timetable, but train VERY hard, IN THE REGION, for combat with Iran, which will probably occur before the Presidential Election of '08.
OK, Madam Putative Speaker, there's your Iraq plan. No charge for the consult.
Now, I STILL need to know why the RNC has let the DNC get away with just about winning this Congressional Election with their hollow call for "change".
What change? Say the change you want! That's all the GOP had to ask, that's all they had to do, then the majority of voters would have seen the GOP as willing to look at reasonable alternatives, and the GOP would have been retained in power, as is normal during a time of war.
Instead, Pelosi et al have been allowed to stay silent on Iraq change, as well as their basic plans (to take the country Socialist).
That was a major RNC mistake.
A game-changing mistake.
If Pelosi gains any traction at all, there will likely be a coat-tail effect in '08, and once the (D)onks get it all back, they will push a rapid agenda that will remove the last vestiges of individual rights from our society. If you want a preview of that, look at England now (or any of the European nations, for that matter).
Historians will look back to the election campaign of '06, and note that the GOP just laid down and let the (D)onks get away with running a campaign with no stated agenda behind it.
It is all but writ.