Nom de plume: Rivrdog

Sunday sadness scribbling

I'm from an old and prolific Portland medical family, & I'm normally highly sympathetic with the medical profession.

 

I've turned, though. The obvious fact is that most doctors have chugged the commie Kool-Aid, and keep chugging it.

 

I profile a lot. I was taught how to do it in the various police academies I attended and in follow-on LEO training courses, plus profiling is just organizing common sense.

 

My main profiling these days is to classify and categorize the political opposition to our Constitutional Republic, but you already know that if you follow me on Facebook or on this Rivrdog Blog.

 

I will now profile the medical profession, and it isn't looking good for them. Here are my profile qualifiers:

1. Do you (choose one) a. Tolerate, b. Support or c. Actively Defend and advocate for Socialized Medicine? (record answer and move on)

2. In your entire office or suite of offices in a medical comples, is there a single US Flag on display? (record answer and move on)

3. If your work is for a health maintenance org claiming a religious afiliation, do you refer low-spirit cases to practitioners of the religion? (record answer and move on)

4. As to Covid-19, do you (choose one): a. Tolerate, b. Support or c. Actively Defend the suppression of alternate views on the USA's response to the disease vector? (record answer and calculate results):

 

Perfect (good) profile (rates Zero)

Item one should be a "no" on any of the three choices.

Item two should be a "yes"

Item three should be a "yes"

Item four should be a "no" on any of the three choices.

 

Here's the bad part: I have two offspring in the medical profession. One rates between 1 and 2, the other between 3 and 4, and they are nowhere as PROFESSIONALLY antagonistic towards the Republic as some other medical providers I've encountered in the past ten years or so.

 

In conclusion, I'm going to put it all together: the two most important professions in this USA are Information movers (newsies, computer gurus, etc) and Medical Providers. Both those professions are badly compromised as to maintaining the health and vibrancy of our Constitution and governance according to it.

 

Looking for what profession DOES unilaterally support our Constitution and governance according to it, I find only Veterans. A few months ago, I would have said Veterans and LEOs (I am retired from both professions), but the LEO profession has guzzled enough commie Kool Aid to remove themselves now as saviors of the American Way, following the Information movers right over the Marxist cliff.

 

Result? Of the 8.5 million Veterans, MAYBE 5 million are fit to fight for this Republic against the communist hordes.

 

Those aren't very good odds.

Blue-State Governors are Tyrants

This post deals with Oregon's Governor, Kate Brown, a democrat/socialist.

Copied from my Facebook post of just now.

Re: Oregon Constitution, Article X, Section 6:

Sorry, Oregonians, court precedent says when Government sets rules of "Sunshine", they must be followed or else all actions taken in the illegal sessions must be considered invalid.

The Governor's Emergency Declaration, which went into effect at midnight March 7th, expired 30 days later. Gauleiter Kate will, of course, claim that the Legislative Emergency Board action to approve an "Extension" gives her authority to continue her Nazi-style lockdown and suspension of personal liberty, but by the clear language of the Article and Section, it does NOT. How the HELL can secret phone "sessions" qualify as "Convening the Legislature", or, for THAT matter, how can a "meeting" of the E-Board qualify for this Constitutional mandate to actually HAVE a REAL SESSION? The Constitution means what it says. This Article & Section can ONLY be met by proper Notice to Speaker & Senate President, who then MUST make the duly-constituted Public announcement, then the Legislators arrive at the place to convene PHYSICALLY, then the Session is called to order. A proper extension of the Governor's Emergency Declaration also involves drafting a Bill for an Act, having it read in the appropriate Committee, voted out of that Committee to the Floor, debated, etc. There is PROCESS, and no amount of "danger" from the disease allows it to be circumvented. If you believe so, YOU may also properly be considered a Tyrant and usurper/destroyer of the Oregon Constitution.

Then there is the matter of the Primacy of the Federal over the State Constitution. The State Constitution clearly says when there is a conflict of Primacy, the Constitution guaranteeing the highest condition of Liberty takes precedence. See Article 1, Section 33.

Is #KillerKate going to argue that she has the power to suspend personal liberties when the Feds interpret THEIR Constitution to say those liberties MUST be preserved? When President Trump says, as he already had, that the States may resume commerce and life, liberty and etc, then Section 33 comes into effect.

If you believe the Governor, you: (1) Haven't READ the Constitutions, and/or (2) do not possess the reasoning power called Logic which is REQUIRED in order to make such interpretations.

That is all. You ARE free to pursue a normal life in Oregon now, and have been for over 21 days. If you decide, as I have, to continue your medical isolation, (I am properly considered "medically fragile") that is now and always was your choice. If you decide to END your medical isolation, THAT is also your choice.

Yes, YOU are FREE to make this choice, and the State is NOT FREE to restrict your right to do so.

BTW, true statistics show that the State's first claim that a "calamity" existed, a claim necessary for perfecting the Emergency Declaration (Article X, Sections (2) & (3), was NEVER TRUE. It just never even slightly approached that level that she claimed after Trump's "Epidemiologist" lied through HIS teeth, and constinues to at this hour. Proper investigation WILL show that high-level objections to "calamity" status were buried on orders of #KorruptKate, I will put $$$ on that...

BTW2: In Oregon, the civil Tort of False Imprisonment usually bring the falsely imprisoned compensation of about $3,000 per day. Multiply that by 4.2 million Oregonians and then by 21 days. My calculator gags on that number, but I believe it is $264.60 times ten to the tenth power. That's how much the State owes it citizens, and I'm going to bet that a class-action claim for this WILL be filed soon. The State's credit rating from Moody's dies on the filing date, and the State goes bankrupt shortly thereafter.

New point to ponder: If all the Blue States have to declare insolvency, how does President Trump deal with that? My guess? He fights their declarations of insolvency by accusing them all of conspiring via the Democratic Party to overthrow the US Government via #ScamDemic. If he can make THAT stick, then RICO the Democratic Party, and they accept blame, THEN he will allow bankruptcy, with conditions. The first condition: No more Democratic Party USA.

Re-open the USA NOW!

You won't see such analysis on the MSM, but all over the country, protests against the lockdowns are ramping up.

 

This might indeed, be out of frustration at President Trump, who has vacillated badly twice now on re-opening commerce.

 

It's this way, Mr. President. The WORLD now knows that this virus is not going to end life as we know it, as it was projected to do just 3 weeks ago. What we DO know is that the Democrats are trying to make their meager political position into a political juggernaut via the suspensions of personal liberty in the States which they control.

 

I don't see this issue in terms of the disease at all, even though I'm one of the "high-risk" folks myself, with 3 major risk factors, not just one.

 

I see this issue as a stark attempted subversion of the Constitution which I am FOREVER sworn to protect and defend.

 

If Covid-19 HAD been the killer virus it was hyped up to be by WHO and the Left, TEMPORARY suspensions of civil liberty would have been appropriate. Since those projections have all failed, and the disease is hardly a threat to healthy people, only a threat to the unhealthy, continued violations of our Constitutional guarantees of Liberty are intolerable.

 

Re-open the USA, Mr. Trump. Your continued refusal to do that begins to give the impression that you, too, have no particular passion for our Constitution.

 

Order some sort of re-opening plan, and prepare to use whatever force is necessary to overcome the objections of China's allies, the Democratic Party.

 

If your present waffling continues, Mr. President, I believe that today's gathering protest-storm will quickly devolve into Civil War, and that war will be raging before Independence Day.

 

Take charge, Mr. President. That's YOUR job. You have all the authority you need to re-open the USA.

 

Use it!

My last blog-post, maybe...

Patriots can ignore this post, it's meant for Liberals.

 

One day soon, well before this Nation gets into the lazy, hazy days of summer, every adult in the country will be forced by circumstances mostly NOT under their control to make a stark choice: when the shooting starts for the now-inevitable Civil War, which side will you join up to fight for?

 

Sitting it out will NOT be an option. The fighting will be nasty, CV-19 will be a walk in the park by comparison.

 

YOU.WILL.HAVE.TO.CHOOSE!

 

First of all, you will have to feed yourself and your loved ones. This will be a logistical war. Think the TP shortage, only all the FOOD will be gone, not just paper products and hand sanitizer. After the first week of war, there will be no more food, then the combatants will begin killing each other for food supplies.

 

Regardless of your political persuasion, you'd better make some war-buddy alliances. Start a Militia if you have the leadership skills to run it. If not, find one and JOIN it, following ORDERS of your leaders. Those orders WILL involve you risking your life on a frequent basis to accomplish the missions of that Militia.

 

Liberals, in case you still believe that your political leaders wouldn't START a Civil War, you're wrong. They already HAVE started it. All large-scale wars start on economic bases, and the Democratic Party decided to destroy this Nation's economy to serve their end of destroying the Nation's President, Mr. Trump.

 

Such a broad-scale plan of national treachery can't be called anything but war. Most of the large-scale wars of the past two centuries started with a lot less provocation than #PlanDemic.

 

The Left outnumbers the Right in total people available to fight, but the Right has the Force Multiplier: millions of experienced military veterans, most of them well-armed. They will count coup at least five-to-one over the Left.

 

The Left is doomed to lose this war, mostly because their only potential ally which could make a difference, China, is 6500 miles away, and lacks the ability to project their large army over that distance in the face of our Navy and Air Force.

 

No, the Left will have to slug it out in the cities, and the Right will control the logistical infrastructure, and will simply starve the Left out. The Right will let the Left have the Cities, with their starvation and disease. CV-19 Version 2, will kill far more of the Left's forces off than the well-aimed bullets from the Right's rifles.

 

The only controversial thing about this post is that this future should have been obvious to the Left for the last 3 years, but they just kept making sharper Left turns, and now have succeeded in creating the perfect Loxodromic Curve, in which they've flown up their own butts.

 

Can this war be forestalled? Possibly, but the Left's leaders, worldwide, would have to, in the next week or so, admit that they've warred on Trump and his 63 million voters, totally fold up the #scamdemic, and offer reparations to repair the damage caused so far. Political momentum says that won't happen, so now the world WILL experience World War Three and degenerate into smaller nation-states, NONE of which will be the Socialist Utopias the Left was trying for.

 

Most will be city-states run by warlords. Global commerce won't recover for at least a century. Your cell phone won't work after July. It will be a beans and bullets barter system in what's left of the USA.

 

You won't want to live here anymore, Liberals, but the rest of the planet will be worse off.

 

You made your bed, now lie in it, Liberals.

 

If any Patriots got this far in my post, remember, save one bullet for yourself. The Warrior's Code says we have that right.

 

May God have mercy on our Souls.

 

Post-script: Hard copy available in case the Left can't stand to face the future they brought and shuts my account down. If you want one, most know where to find me, for the next two weeks anyway, after which it won't matter who is writing History, will it?

SCOTUS puts itself on trial

News: SCOTUS to decide DACA, which was ONLY an Obama Executive Order, NOT a Federal Law.

 

Options for the Supremes:

 

1. SCOTUS decides to strictly interpret the Constitution and decide that the President (yes, DACA supporters, Mr Trump IS President) DOES have the authority to end an Obama EO.

 

2. SCOTUS decides that Obama's DACA EO somehow has Majik Powers in it, and has morphed somehow into a Federal Law? That process thereby states a new Federal Civil Right not mentioned in our Constitution nor even imagined by the Founders, and yes, they COULD have given immigrants permanent rights BEFORE naturalization, but didn't.

 

3. SCOTUS decides to remove Immigration Authority from the President by granting a DACA "right" permanent status AND granting RELATIVES of the DACA immigrants permanent status also. The Liberal Justices WOULD agree with that, because it fits "It's for the Children", which is a Liberal HOLY WRIT (political Liberalism being a Belief system, an ESTABLISHED RELIGION to the Liberal Justices), superceding the Constitution (just like Chief Justice Robert's infamous granting of Holy Writ status to the Obamacare penalty as a "tax" granted extra-legal power to the Liberals).

 

No, the SCOTUS itself is on trial here, and that Branch is on trial while a "soft Civil War" is in progress, with the House of Representatives having suspended Constitutional Due Process with it's "Impeachment Inquiry" and SCOTUS having ignored that usurpation of our Constitution. In this DACA case, SCOTUS itself MUST get involved to save our Constitution, and rule that the #1 option above is the ONLY possible outcome.

 

If SCOTUS takes option 2 or 3 above, it has JOINED IN the Communist destruction of our Constitution that IS this "soft Civil War", and perhaps then, Patriots will FINALLY decide that yes, we ARE at war internally, and act to remove these threats to our Republic and our Constitution.

 

Remove, as in terminate with extreme prejudice. We're going to have to physically fight the communists. It's mass delusion on a fatal scale to say we won't.

The "New" World Order and why it must die

A somber subject to be sure.

Eighty years ago, most of the world went to war with National Socialists. The National Socialists, aka "Fascists", declared their "1,000-year Reich", a World Order, and were then totally defeated.

 

The victorious Nations got together, formed the United Nations, declared that National Socialism would never again besmirch the world, but the collegial diplomats did NOTHING to protect their planet.

 

Today, we have the "New" World Order, a shadowy group very much dedicated to achieving the same goals of Socialism that were defeated 74 years ago and were outlawed by those United Nations 70 years ago.

 

In the meanwhile, the United Nations has now become the biggest enabler of National Socialism, which masquerades as other things, but on it's face, real socialism can't hide it's face, even when it tries hard to do that.

 

We're about to have another war to defeat Socialism right here in this USA, and the "New" World Order will see to it that the war is again, a World War.

 

My father fought in WW2, won that VICTORY, and passed the ensuing Mantle of Peace down to me. I did MY military duty and protected it, as best as I could, and the Oaths I swore are as sacred as the Oaths my father swore before me and my Daughter swore after me.

 

Every day, in many ways, the "New" World Order of Socialism tries to blunt my Oath, and I will eventually have to take up arms again to make good on that Oath.

 

The "New" World Order has an objective: after destroying the world as we now know it, rebuild a nation-less global society, no borders, no ethnic differences, total fealty to the Order and it's leaders. There are over 6.5 billion people on this planet now, and the "New" World Order has decided that all but a billion of them are surplus, and famines and war is the best way to reduce the populations to their target level. Oh, abortion, also.

 

Maybe 30-50 people sit in the top rank of the "New" World Order, and at their behest, five and a half billion people must die, if their goal is to be met.

 

Unless that 30-50 people in the "New" World Order top rank dies first, the depopulation of the planet will happen.

 

YOU face a choice of whose side to take in this conflict.

 

I'm already sworn as to which side I will take.

 

Yes, the choice has come down to this.

Trump's Kurdish brush-off: the BIG picture

As I turn my pundit's eyes on this, I see Trump in la-la-land. In a dream, he has convinced himself that Turkey will be a better ally then the Kurds.

Yes, the Kurds ARE fickle, have fought for both sides against the middle, but in the end, we KNOW what the Kurds want: they want a Kurdistan, a homeland.

Few follow Ergodan close enough to know what he really wants: he wants to be Caliph in his version of an Islamic Caliphate.

Now think about each those two results as a separate outcome: a Kurdistan, where Christians would be welcome, or a Caliphate, where they wouldn't be? Easy enough for me to decide, and frankly, I can't understand a lot of my smarter friends, Trump supporters all, not seeing this obvious fork in the road.

Islam is an irrestible force, implacable because their "Holy Writ", the Qu'ran, orders them to keep converting everyone to Islam until there are no more Infidels left. Those they can't convert must be put to the sword. Now, my Trump-Tight friends, just what part of THAT nightmare scenario will be fixed by "Fortress America"?

Nope, because the West failed to REMOVE Islam when it had the chance, a thousand and more years ago, we ARE stuck in a forever war TODAY. If we just beat feet as Trump wants to do, Islam wins again, in Syria, gets stronger, and eventually gobbles up that Nation, which is now secular, not Islamist.

It's our turn to be gobbled up next, if we don't put some hurt on the fundamentalist Mullahs, BAD hurt, and we can't do that from inside our own borders unless we want to go nuclear on them. Look at our own "fiftth column", the Democratic Party. Pro-Islam all the way, they are ON RECORD as favoring acceptance of Islam over our Constitution, which the Founders wrote so as to EXCLUDE Islam.

As I see Trump, the human being, he has a very "human" fault: he wants to be Mister Nice Guy. His mistake here was simply trying Nice before Necessity.

The R2KBA, and why there will be WAR to protect it

I get up, trot down the companionway to the Mess Deck, find da wiff asleep in front of Misogynist-NBC. A headline blares: "Trump finds big mental health problem in gun violence". While I'm pouring a BIG cuppa Joe (with her, if the day starts with MSNBC, it's gonna be a LONG day for me, need BIG coffee), the femolly mouthmessers start talking Backgroud Checks which are Registration (yes, the Left now admits that Registration is a goal, presumably on the road to Prohibition and Confiscation).

 

I take the first sip of the hot coffee, and the "scales fall from my eyes" (Acts 9: 1-22). Why YES, they probably HAVE cited the Trumpster correctly for once. There are ONLY three mentally healthy cases for gun violence: self-defense from lethal attack, organized warfare, and violence committed on food animals, i.e. Bambi. All other violent uses for firearms are mental aberrations, and should be prohibited, but WAIT, there's more.

 

Mentally aberrant gun violence IS already prohibited, in fact, in most places, you may not even fire your gun except for one of the three above cases or upon an organized shooting range. Can't fire it, it harms no one, right?

 

WRONG! The very EXISTENCE of guns is violent, claim the gun-grabbers, because the FACT of a gun's existence EQUATES to violence, in their not-so-humble opinions. It is MIND-VIOLENCE, or terror that they describe. MY guns cause them to be terrorized. Because.

 

Summing up the "Gun-Grabber Philosophy", we find that:

1. All guns are evil, all the time, PERIOD.

2. All guns WILL be FOREVER evil, no good can ever come from a gun.

3. By extension, all those possessing or bearing arms are EVIL, so it's logical to pre-empt their EVIL by restraining them.

 

My friends, I try to live my life appreciating, learning and practicing LOGIC, which is the DEFINED "normal" mental state of mind. The ILLOGIC presented by the anti-gun people is astounding in it's ABNORMALITY, as is the potential for terrorism on the part of the gun-grabbers towards a significant part of our USA's population (the gun-owners).

 

Far from PREVENTING gun-violence, the gun-grabbers actually PROMOTE it by attempting to overturn our God-Given and Constitution-encoded Civil Rights.

 

Sadly, this leaves us only one choice, if the Left manages to convince a fairly decent President Trump to encode more gun-banning even before the Left has a political right (gets elected) to do that.

 

That choice is to declare organized warfare upon the gun-grabbers, to protect our Constitution and it's orderly society from their planned (and now OPERATIONAL) anarchy and disorder.

 

Desist, gun-grabbers, or suffer the consequences of the prevention of your intended destruction of my country. I'm SWORN, on an Oath backed with my very blood, to prevent what you plan for and now show you intend to do to my country.

 

I am sworn to war with the gun-grabbers, and so is every other Veteran. We ARE the #TenMillionRifles.

Gun control in World History

Now that the Democrat Marxist Party has decided it's now or never to toss our Constitution, their choice to do that is Gun Control, and within that choice, the Red Flag Law (ERPO). ERPO is nothing less that changing the very definition of gun ownership to community-based gun ownership. There history here, so let's look at it.

BTW, history repeats itself because few people are smart enough to develop new ideas.  Keep THAT nugget in mind, it's vital here.

 

Case in point: gun control. It was started by Statists, who even then had a vision of Marxist world domination (See the rapid spread of the 1917 Red October Revolution from Russia to all over Europe).

 

That Revolution succeeded, put Marxists in power in a large, but poorly-organized country, Russia. Marxists showed how good they were in organizing a huge new Statist government to run their huge country.

 

The first thing Russia did was disarm their population, to prevent a counter-revolution. Notice that is exactly opposite to what OUR Founders did after winning our Revolution against the British? We insisted that our countrymen be armed!

 

Along came the Great Depression, which Wall Street Investment bankers started because they were greedy (See: Goldman, Sachs and their "margin buying" of equities). During the Great Depression, robber-gangs arose and preyed on the banks, so reviled because they were blamed for the Depression, and therefore easy targets: who gave a rip if a bank was robbed?

 

In the depths of our Depression, we stupidly elected a free-spending liberal President, FDR. He WAS a smart guy, and looked around to find the support for his liberal Administration, one well Left of anyone else's so far in our history.

 

FDR looked at Russia, saw the organization, the determination to succeed of the Soviets (he ignored the misery the Soviets were causing). He looked at Germany, the failed Weimar Republic there just being replaced by the National Socialist Party, with Hitler being appointed Chancellor in late October of 1933.

 

As FDR looked at both examples, one thing jumped off the pages at him: gun control. Along with jawboning some hope back into the USA, FDR decided to do Gun Control, since he had a ready excuse: the robber-gangs. His idea worked, and the track was laid for the Left to ride the Gun Control Train all the way to NOW.

 

The Gun Control Express has FOREVER been the mode of Liberals showing their "decisiveness". They're still at it.

 

Now, the end of the Gun Control tracks is in sight, though. There is no more railroad to the future for the Left, and they have determined to kill the 1A, the 2A and the 4A with one fell swoop, so they advocate community-approved gun ownership be the model for the 2A. If ALL your family and neighbors approve, you may own guns, but if even ONE objects, your guns are taken away. That's the Red Flag Law*.

 

People, we stop Marxism in it's tracks, NOW, or it WILL swallow us up, in months, not years or decades. If we DON'T stop Marxism now, our Constitutional Republic is dead. The first few Amendments of the Bill of Rights IS the Bill of Rights, and the Bill of Rights IS our Constitution, all else which follows is simple process.

 

When we lose the Bill of Rights, we have lost the United States of America.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

*I wanted to post a straight legal definition of Red Flag, but after three searches, I can't find one which is NOT ublished by anti-2A advocates.

The USA vs the New World Order

(Same old conflict, different era)

Our Federal Constitution is anti-New World Order. By DESIGN.

 

When our Constitution was promulgated, there WAS a New World Order, the British Empire. Their Navy ruled the world's seas, their armies vanquished all they faced. It was His Majesty's Way or no way at all.

 

The Founders rejected the hegemony of the British Empire, formed a SEPARATE government with ELECTED, not ENTITLED leaders, and fought the King's armies to a standstill and ultimate victory at Yorktown.

 

The Founders did one more thing though. Knowing that Royalist feelings still ran high on these shores, and deducing that their new Popular government would eventually have to face Royalists again, the Founders gave that new American population the right to possess arms for DEFENSE AGAINST GOVERNMENT, should our Government try to go back to Royalism (the NWO).

 

The Second Amendment to the Constitution is NOT an anti-crime law, crime as we know it today was unknown in the Founders' day. The 2A was a check on the power of the Government, purely and simply. If that Government caved to the NWO, it was to be REMOVED. As such a bulwark, it was VERY anti-New World Order.

 

It still IS anti-NWO, and THAT is why the NWO, through all their proxies (D-Rats, Antifa, global Marxism in general), CONSTANTLY tries to weaken and remove the 2A.

 

This is just my opinion, but I do not believe we have budged the NWO on their opposition to the 2A at all. They will keep trying to remove it and grab all our guns, because they KNOW that they can't take over in this Nation until they do. Furthermore, following my logic here, the ONLY way the NWO will ever be defeated is like it was 241 years ago, on the field of battle.

 

Sorry to burst your bubble(s), but there is NO peaceful way out of this. We either face the NWO and defeat them utterly, or we accept them as our lords and masters and give up all our freedoms.

 

There is no middle ground that will work for us. It's us or them.

 

Shields up, double-front! We're going in!