Nom de plume: Rivrdog

Library porn & how to fight it

We have two Library Boards here in the small City of Coeur D'Alene, Idaho. The CdA Public Library and the Community Library Network. We also have a "Constitutional Sheriff", Bob Norris, and the usual assortment of Marxist trash seeking to control all aspects of education. The Marxists have less success here than most other places, one of the big reasons I settled here after Oregon went Full Commie.

One of the usual ways the Marxists establish their beach-head of force used to destroy American Values is via taking over Library Boards, and they have done that here. Americans gained back some ground last election when we removed two Marxists from the Community Library Network's Board, but that's only slowed down the Marxists, not defeated them utterly. At a Town Hall meeting, which the Sheriff holds quarterly, a citizen asked about children's access to books with inappropriate sexual context. Sheriff Norris said he'd look into that, and he did. He visited the Post Falls Community Library and found two inappropriate books there.

Enter the "Yellow" press, or cdapress.com to be exact. They publish this guy's guest op-ed. He outright accuses the Sheriff of theft. I have decided to reply and submitted this letter, not published yet:

Please accept my reply to My Turn writer Lockwood, who writes to accuse Sheriff Norris of theft as he took a pair of books from the library for the purposes of investigation.

 

Mr Lockwood, these books were accessible to children and their express purpose is to TEACH varied sexual practices. I suspect that you believe that expertise in carnal knowlege must be extended to children as soon as they can read.

 

Religion has nothing to do with it, Mr Lockwood. This is about a case which could easily cross the line into child pornography, and it is certainly the Duty of a Sheriff to conduct an investigation to determine if probable cause exists to prosecute for those charges.

 

Indeed, Sheriff Norris would be remiss in his duty by NOT making this investigation. As to you, sir, your zeal in promoting this possible child pornography is very, very telling.

 

Sheriff, wouldn't it be appropriate to issue the Library a Property Inventory Receipt in this case?

 

Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.

 

New month, new prediction

Rabbit-Rabbit.

New month, new hopes, need more work on getting ready. End of first-of-the-month platitudes.

The GOPers backed down, passed a 45-day CR, so no default until the middle of November. GOPer hopefuls are having a good time pretending Trump doesn't matter. There's never been a massive write-in campaign in the history of our Presidential elections, but there might be one next year.

If that campaign were to actually ELECT Trump, but the Dem/Commies denied him his seat, THAT would start Civil War. Bright line there, yes. Time for blather over then, you're going to fight for Trump and your Constitution or you're going to fight for a tyrant to replace that document. I don't see a middle ground, do YOU?

In the meanwhile, look for Blue States to try to lock Trump out by refusing to accept write-in ballots. This will PROVE intent to have Tyranny replace the Constitution.

You read it here first.

A very good course to take

Day before yesterday, I took a course to qualify for Idaho's "Enhanced Concealed Weapons" permit.

Idaho is Constitutional Carry now, has been for years, but that's good only for Idaho Citizens who carry in Idaho. I am an Idaho citizen new, have been for 3 years. By getting the Enhanced card, I can now be treated, for concealed carry purposes, in almost every other State which issues permits to their citizens, 39 or 40 of them.

Idaho is very protective of the R2KBA. We are considered the best and most protective State for this purpose of all 50. Blue States hate Idaho for this reason, because it isn't all empty talk. Folks who come to Idaho for anti-R2KBA reason gun-grabs, for example, can and wiill be ARRESTED, since there is a CRIMINAL charge for those who act or conspire against the rights of Idaho citizens. Here's an example, here's another example, in the cases of an Idaho citizen using deadly force in  Idaho. Those are slides from GemState's course, and it's from the part of the course which was presented by a Kootenai County Deputy District Attorney. Note that the citizen is PRESUMED to have acted lawfully!

Idaho has both Stand Your Ground laws and No Duty to Retreat laws.

I saved what should have been first for my killer finish, though. Idaho's very definition of the R2KBA. Note that "infringed" as stated in the Federal 2A is changed to "abridged". Guess why? Commies all over the US of A have been suing for 30-40 years to ESTABLISH INFRINGEMENTS against the Federal R2KBA. That can't happen here, thanks to the use of "abridged", the common meaning of which is "made smaller".

Sunday sadness scribbling

I'm from an old and prolific Portland medical family, & I'm normally highly sympathetic with the medical profession.

 

I've turned, though. The obvious fact is that most doctors have chugged the commie Kool-Aid, and keep chugging it.

 

I profile a lot. I was taught how to do it in the various police academies I attended and in follow-on LEO training courses, plus profiling is just organizing common sense.

 

My main profiling these days is to classify and categorize the political opposition to our Constitutional Republic, but you already know that if you follow me on Facebook or on this Rivrdog Blog.

 

I will now profile the medical profession, and it isn't looking good for them. Here are my profile qualifiers:

1. Do you (choose one) a. Tolerate, b. Support or c. Actively Defend and advocate for Socialized Medicine? (record answer and move on)

2. In your entire office or suite of offices in a medical comples, is there a single US Flag on display? (record answer and move on)

3. If your work is for a health maintenance org claiming a religious afiliation, do you refer low-spirit cases to practitioners of the religion? (record answer and move on)

4. As to Covid-19, do you (choose one): a. Tolerate, b. Support or c. Actively Defend the suppression of alternate views on the USA's response to the disease vector? (record answer and calculate results):

 

Perfect (good) profile (rates Zero)

Item one should be a "no" on any of the three choices.

Item two should be a "yes"

Item three should be a "yes"

Item four should be a "no" on any of the three choices.

 

Here's the bad part: I have two offspring in the medical profession. One rates between 1 and 2, the other between 3 and 4, and they are nowhere as PROFESSIONALLY antagonistic towards the Republic as some other medical providers I've encountered in the past ten years or so.

 

In conclusion, I'm going to put it all together: the two most important professions in this USA are Information movers (newsies, computer gurus, etc) and Medical Providers. Both those professions are badly compromised as to maintaining the health and vibrancy of our Constitution and governance according to it.

 

Looking for what profession DOES unilaterally support our Constitution and governance according to it, I find only Veterans. A few months ago, I would have said Veterans and LEOs (I am retired from both professions), but the LEO profession has guzzled enough commie Kool Aid to remove themselves now as saviors of the American Way, following the Information movers right over the Marxist cliff.

 

Result? Of the 8.5 million Veterans, MAYBE 5 million are fit to fight for this Republic against the communist hordes.

 

Those aren't very good odds.

Blue-State Governors are Tyrants

This post deals with Oregon's Governor, Kate Brown, a democrat/socialist.

Copied from my Facebook post of just now.

Re: Oregon Constitution, Article X, Section 6:

Sorry, Oregonians, court precedent says when Government sets rules of "Sunshine", they must be followed or else all actions taken in the illegal sessions must be considered invalid.

The Governor's Emergency Declaration, which went into effect at midnight March 7th, expired 30 days later. Gauleiter Kate will, of course, claim that the Legislative Emergency Board action to approve an "Extension" gives her authority to continue her Nazi-style lockdown and suspension of personal liberty, but by the clear language of the Article and Section, it does NOT. How the HELL can secret phone "sessions" qualify as "Convening the Legislature", or, for THAT matter, how can a "meeting" of the E-Board qualify for this Constitutional mandate to actually HAVE a REAL SESSION? The Constitution means what it says. This Article & Section can ONLY be met by proper Notice to Speaker & Senate President, who then MUST make the duly-constituted Public announcement, then the Legislators arrive at the place to convene PHYSICALLY, then the Session is called to order. A proper extension of the Governor's Emergency Declaration also involves drafting a Bill for an Act, having it read in the appropriate Committee, voted out of that Committee to the Floor, debated, etc. There is PROCESS, and no amount of "danger" from the disease allows it to be circumvented. If you believe so, YOU may also properly be considered a Tyrant and usurper/destroyer of the Oregon Constitution.

Then there is the matter of the Primacy of the Federal over the State Constitution. The State Constitution clearly says when there is a conflict of Primacy, the Constitution guaranteeing the highest condition of Liberty takes precedence. See Article 1, Section 33.

Is #KillerKate going to argue that she has the power to suspend personal liberties when the Feds interpret THEIR Constitution to say those liberties MUST be preserved? When President Trump says, as he already had, that the States may resume commerce and life, liberty and etc, then Section 33 comes into effect.

If you believe the Governor, you: (1) Haven't READ the Constitutions, and/or (2) do not possess the reasoning power called Logic which is REQUIRED in order to make such interpretations.

That is all. You ARE free to pursue a normal life in Oregon now, and have been for over 21 days. If you decide, as I have, to continue your medical isolation, (I am properly considered "medically fragile") that is now and always was your choice. If you decide to END your medical isolation, THAT is also your choice.

Yes, YOU are FREE to make this choice, and the State is NOT FREE to restrict your right to do so.

BTW, true statistics show that the State's first claim that a "calamity" existed, a claim necessary for perfecting the Emergency Declaration (Article X, Sections (2) & (3), was NEVER TRUE. It just never even slightly approached that level that she claimed after Trump's "Epidemiologist" lied through HIS teeth, and constinues to at this hour. Proper investigation WILL show that high-level objections to "calamity" status were buried on orders of #KorruptKate, I will put $$$ on that...

BTW2: In Oregon, the civil Tort of False Imprisonment usually bring the falsely imprisoned compensation of about $3,000 per day. Multiply that by 4.2 million Oregonians and then by 21 days. My calculator gags on that number, but I believe it is $264.60 times ten to the tenth power. That's how much the State owes it citizens, and I'm going to bet that a class-action claim for this WILL be filed soon. The State's credit rating from Moody's dies on the filing date, and the State goes bankrupt shortly thereafter.

New point to ponder: If all the Blue States have to declare insolvency, how does President Trump deal with that? My guess? He fights their declarations of insolvency by accusing them all of conspiring via the Democratic Party to overthrow the US Government via #ScamDemic. If he can make THAT stick, then RICO the Democratic Party, and they accept blame, THEN he will allow bankruptcy, with conditions. The first condition: No more Democratic Party USA.

SCOTUS puts itself on trial

News: SCOTUS to decide DACA, which was ONLY an Obama Executive Order, NOT a Federal Law.

 

Options for the Supremes:

 

1. SCOTUS decides to strictly interpret the Constitution and decide that the President (yes, DACA supporters, Mr Trump IS President) DOES have the authority to end an Obama EO.

 

2. SCOTUS decides that Obama's DACA EO somehow has Majik Powers in it, and has morphed somehow into a Federal Law? That process thereby states a new Federal Civil Right not mentioned in our Constitution nor even imagined by the Founders, and yes, they COULD have given immigrants permanent rights BEFORE naturalization, but didn't.

 

3. SCOTUS decides to remove Immigration Authority from the President by granting a DACA "right" permanent status AND granting RELATIVES of the DACA immigrants permanent status also. The Liberal Justices WOULD agree with that, because it fits "It's for the Children", which is a Liberal HOLY WRIT (political Liberalism being a Belief system, an ESTABLISHED RELIGION to the Liberal Justices), superceding the Constitution (just like Chief Justice Robert's infamous granting of Holy Writ status to the Obamacare penalty as a "tax" granted extra-legal power to the Liberals).

 

No, the SCOTUS itself is on trial here, and that Branch is on trial while a "soft Civil War" is in progress, with the House of Representatives having suspended Constitutional Due Process with it's "Impeachment Inquiry" and SCOTUS having ignored that usurpation of our Constitution. In this DACA case, SCOTUS itself MUST get involved to save our Constitution, and rule that the #1 option above is the ONLY possible outcome.

 

If SCOTUS takes option 2 or 3 above, it has JOINED IN the Communist destruction of our Constitution that IS this "soft Civil War", and perhaps then, Patriots will FINALLY decide that yes, we ARE at war internally, and act to remove these threats to our Republic and our Constitution.

 

Remove, as in terminate with extreme prejudice. We're going to have to physically fight the communists. It's mass delusion on a fatal scale to say we won't.

Will the Swamp ever REALLY get Drained?

Knowing now that Obama likely started the "Resistance" vs Trump before anyone else knew about it, makes for VERY strong evidence to sue the Democratic Party into oblivion and RICO their $$$ FOREVER!

 

How about it, Judicial Watch? You have the people and YOU, ALONE, are still actively Draining The Swamp.

 

The usual drill in political lawsuits would have JW waiting until Barr and his DOJ give them the word, but there is a significant chance that "word" will never come down, that @POTUS will not order Barr to indict anyone, and Barr won't do it of his own volition, even though that's within his purview as USAG.

 

@POTUS seems satisfied with hammering out Tweets and using acerbic language at his tub-thumper rally-speeches.

 

As I've said before in these spaces, the "Resistance" including the phony "''peaching", will not stop unless and until one or more major (D)-players are booked on their indictiments. There is enough evidence for indictments, especially HRC, and now Obama himself, not to mention Holder and company, Bubba and Miss Lynn.

 

I am afraid that now there will be no accountablity for the worst cases of Treason in our 242-year history UNLESS JW steps up to the plate with a Civil lawsuit, and that will MAYBE springboard the conflict-adverse President into taking CRIMINAL action against this cabal of Traitors known as the Democratic Party.

No Obama peeps will ever see Prison

Don't make too big a deal out of USAG Barr announcing that he has a "criminal" investigation going vs. the Obama/NWO collaborators.

 

It won't mean a thing if it ain't got that ZING! For there to be justice served, President Trump has to harden his heart.

 

There's a Trump-wall there now, just like President Jerry Ford faced with Tricky Dick Nixon, and Trump will do the same thing as Ford did...pardon Obummer almost as soon as an indictment comes down or even before it when it becomes obvious that he WILL be indicted.

 

Of course, that would collapse the cases against the other major players. The end result will be that NOT ONE of the Obama/NWO collaborators does a day in prison.

 

Sorry to be the bearer of bad tidings here, but your President has already showed this tendency, with the last few mass shootings, by saying that he felt gun ownership restrictions were okay to prevent further carnage, that AFTER he had stood on stage with Wayne LaPierre at NRA-Con and declared solidarity to protect the 2A against further Infringements.

 

He will be all about "Healing the Nation's divide" when it's Obama's turn to be indicted. Not only that, I don't think he will even ask/require Obama to apologize publicly, so Obama will walk, head high, and nothing will change, the "Resistance" will go forward, even as Trump wins re-election.

 

I hope my readers can see this. Hit pause on your "Trump-tightness" for a moment, and consider the REALPOLITIK involved. How often has Trump actually swung his Hammer except on Trade, and even with that, he's ready to wuss out with USMCA, a NWO Trade plan if there ever was one.

 

Nope, we elected Mister Nice Guy. WE can appreciate him for this quality, but the Left sure won't.

Trump's Kurdish brush-off: the BIG picture

As I turn my pundit's eyes on this, I see Trump in la-la-land. In a dream, he has convinced himself that Turkey will be a better ally then the Kurds.

Yes, the Kurds ARE fickle, have fought for both sides against the middle, but in the end, we KNOW what the Kurds want: they want a Kurdistan, a homeland.

Few follow Ergodan close enough to know what he really wants: he wants to be Caliph in his version of an Islamic Caliphate.

Now think about each those two results as a separate outcome: a Kurdistan, where Christians would be welcome, or a Caliphate, where they wouldn't be? Easy enough for me to decide, and frankly, I can't understand a lot of my smarter friends, Trump supporters all, not seeing this obvious fork in the road.

Islam is an irrestible force, implacable because their "Holy Writ", the Qu'ran, orders them to keep converting everyone to Islam until there are no more Infidels left. Those they can't convert must be put to the sword. Now, my Trump-Tight friends, just what part of THAT nightmare scenario will be fixed by "Fortress America"?

Nope, because the West failed to REMOVE Islam when it had the chance, a thousand and more years ago, we ARE stuck in a forever war TODAY. If we just beat feet as Trump wants to do, Islam wins again, in Syria, gets stronger, and eventually gobbles up that Nation, which is now secular, not Islamist.

It's our turn to be gobbled up next, if we don't put some hurt on the fundamentalist Mullahs, BAD hurt, and we can't do that from inside our own borders unless we want to go nuclear on them. Look at our own "fiftth column", the Democratic Party. Pro-Islam all the way, they are ON RECORD as favoring acceptance of Islam over our Constitution, which the Founders wrote so as to EXCLUDE Islam.

As I see Trump, the human being, he has a very "human" fault: he wants to be Mister Nice Guy. His mistake here was simply trying Nice before Necessity.

Wishful Thinking

I have observed that President Trump is a Wishful Thinker. He WISHES that the D-Rats would end their "Resistance" and let him govern as he was elected to do, and maybe even JOIN him in governing.

Sorry, Mr President, that isn't going to happen. To the D-Rats, Communism here in the USA was INEVITABLE, Hillary's election was INEVITABLE, and killing off GOPes as a Party with illegals voting was INEVITABLE. You have interrupted the INEVITABILITY of their process, so they say that YOU must go, Mr. President.

So we now have YOUR Wishful Thinking, Mr Trump, and it's delaying the D-Rats' inevitability. This confilict will only end when one side vanquishes the other, sir. Unless YOU want to surrender to the D-Rat Communists and be vanquished, YOU must vanquish THEM. As in, REMOVE them from the conflict. Since it's too early in the conflict's rational continuum for guns, YOU must arrest a few of them for the obvious corruption charges you can prove and thereby force the others to retreat into obscurity. You have no choice in this process, Mr President.

It's YOU or THEM.

There is NO middle ground.

ACT, Mr President!