Nom de plume: Rivrdog

Working up to Qual Day - LEOSA04 Qualification

As an Honorably Retired peace officer, I have a National Carry privilege. Okay, all you Constitutional Carry peeps, got the hate out of your system? If not, click elsewhere. I protected my community as a Patrol Deputy for 25 years, so I deserve this. Want some of it? Kick your CongressCritter in  the buttski and tell that DeepState weasel to bring forward the Reciprocity Act.

Enough politicking. This post is about working up skills, long rusty. Why rusty, you say? I'm going Retro*. Turning back the calendar to 1986, the last time I carried a revolver on duty. Yep, I'm going to leave the europellet** flingers, the Glocks, the Remington R51 and the Ruger LCS-9-Pro in the safe and pull out my Ruger Service-Six 38, a stainless 4"-bbl service revolver with fixed sights. Original wooden grips, only "custom" on it is a dab of VERY bright orange nail polish on the front sight blade. It rides, along with a 2X-Speedloader unit, on a 2" pants belt in an Uncle Mike's #2 nylon holster with top-strap. Retention Level-0 equipment. Yes, I do, in fact, carry revolvers concealed. My favorite is my Charter Arms pair, a 44-Special Bulldog and a 40 S&W Pitbull. Speedloaders for the Service-Six are HKS #10. Additional equipment for training are two sets of 6 rounds each Pachmayr dummy loads in 38/357. Lots of dry-firing involved in my work-up routine.

My "Training Range" is the second-floor hallway in Schloss Schneiden. The hallway is 25 feet long, and by using part of the master bedroom, I have 15 yards to work with. The K-5 section of a standard #28 Silhouette target is tacked to the linen-closet door at the far end of the hallway. Lighting is about the same as range lighting.

Here is the Police Qualification Course for Off-Duty weapons in Oregon (DPSST standard). I have to meet this standard. Score = 100% hits on the K-5, within the time limits for each stage:

Practical Qualification Course (PQC) I

• 25 Rounds
• Scoring: 100% hits within the 5 zone

1. 10-Yard Line - 3 Rounds
Two hand strong hand fire only
The student starts at the 15-yard line, one step right or left of the fire lane.  On the signal, the student conducts an "L" movement to the cover barrel at 10-yards, draws and fires from cover one round strong side, and round over the top and one round support side.
Time Limit: 15 seconds

2. 7-Yard Line - 6 Rounds
On the signal, the student draws and fires 2 rounds
Time Limit: 4 seconds
Repeat for a total of 6 rounds

3. 5-Yard Line - 8 Rounds
On the signal, the student draws and fires 2 rounds.
The student takes one step right or left and reloads firing 6 additional rounds.  The student then steps back where they started and conducts a tactical reload.
Time Limit: 15 seconds (to fire the 8 rounds, not counting final step and tactical reload.)

4. 3-Yard Line - 6 Rounds
Student draws and fires 3 rounds strong hand only.
The student then takes one step right or left, transfers the weapon to the support hand and fires 3 rounds with support hand only.
Time Limit:  10 seconds

5. 2-Yard Line - 2 Rounds
Student draws while taking 1 step back and fires 2 rounds.  The student then takes 1 step right or left to get out of the line of attack.
Student starts with hand encumbered.
Time Limit:  3 seconds

I have shot this course a number of times with a semi-auto pistol. It was designed for cops shooting quick-reloading pistols. It is easier to shoot with a pistol, probably half-again as hard with a revolver. Unless you are Jerry Miculek, reloading speed with a revo is WAY slower than with a pistol UNLESS you spend hours working with the gun and dummy rounds.

 

I set up my timer and started in on Stage One. I was three seconds over on my first try. I found that I was performing the "L-approach" to the barricade wrong, and when I started on the proper foot, planted the proper foot to drop behind the barricade, I worked up to 12 seconds for the three shooting positions, and repeated that 4 times. Best time was 10.5 seconds. That will work.

 

Stage two is easy. It is draw quickly, raise to a two-handed stance and double-tap. No problems, mostly in the 2.5 second range from the git-go.

 

Stage three is the most difficult of the lot. This is a lead-pipe cinch with a Glock: double-tap, drop-free mag change, drop the slide and hammer, then six more downrange, easy to do in 8 to 10 seconds. With a revo, the draw and double-tap takes 2.5 seconds, THEN you have to do a two-handed cylinder-clear, THEN grab a speedloader out of your pouch, guide it to the the open cylinder face, insert the rounds, activate the speedloader latch, drop the rounds into the cylinder with that tricky little shake-move, then close the cylinder, bring up the gun to two-handed grip and dump the six rounds into that target. First three of my attmpts were over the time limit by 2-3 seconds. I practiced the speedloader work separately for about 10 evolutions and tried again. Dead even with the timer. Tried five more times, eventually settling on a 1.5 to 2 second time UNDER the timer's beep. I need to work that down to a 3-second pad.

 

Stage four is a piece of cake. Never took more than seven seconds for this stage.

 

Stage five is easy, it's a 2-second evolution for me. I remember doing this stage when I wore the Star. The hard-ass Rangemaster demanded that we actually used an interview stance (which doesn't line your gun up well with the target), and flip our police notebook in the FACE of the silhouette before killing the silhouette with the fast-draw and double-tap. This course of fire doesn't require for the notebook-throw, but I still practice it that way. One may also throw up the off-hand in the perp's face, scream your Death-Word in his face, then draw and fire while doing the step-back. Also effective, but some risk of shooting your hand as you pull it back from the distraction-move.

 

Practice today was 90 minutes after my afternoon nap. More practice tomorrow and Monday, then Qual Day on Tuesday with the Clackamas County Sheriff's Office range crew.

 

Pew-Pew days at the range, expending 340 rounds, already in the logbook. This form-of-stages practice is the more important, though.

 

 

Best daily intel on Defense

Your best read is published by the Washington Examiner. It has headlines and in-depth stories regarding military and State Dept issues relating to National Security. Just facts, as little partisan crap as can be put out. It also has a schedule of meetings of NatSec wallahs, so you can get ahead of the twits and Face-mongers.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/national-security

You can sign up to get the newsletter via email at that link.

 

"Russia Hacked Us", and other fairy tales

Do the Democrats want to leave, as the final "legacy" of Obama, a total distrust of US Intelligence agencies? That's where they are headed. Check out this Breitbart poll, which shows only 29% of US citizens believe this fake news story. Since 52% of Democrats believe the fake news, that means that just about NOBODY but Democrats believe it.

This means two things: first, since the lead US Intelligence official, General James Clapper, head of Obama's D.N.I., swore to Congress today that the hacking happened, President-elect Trump has a LOT of damage to repair in the US Intelligence "Alphabet Soup".

How should Mr. Trump repair that damage? Try these ideas, Mr. Trump:

• Dump Clapper, and hard. I would ask that the Congress look into indicting him for Contempt of Congress for lying on no less than three separate occasions to the House.
• Appoint as Clapper's replacement a leader of impeccable integrity, not necessarily a spook and especially not necessarily a politician.
• Establish a new standard of de-politicizing US Intelligence.

Do these things, Mr. Trump, and you MIGHT repair the damage that Clapper has done at the urging of the Left.

Martial Law - Why it fails

• It is obvious that it is only a means to an end, killing the Constitution. Even the so-called "low information voters" will see that it is.
• For it to have ANY chance of acceptance, it would have to be announced by a leader with far more credibility than Obama. None such exist at the moment.
• For it to work, it would have to be accepted by the entire military. I would be surprised if it gets 20% acceptance in the ranks. There would be even less acceptance from the National Guard.
• Martial Law means using military force on US citizens. The dumbest and most dependent of them will fail to support it when their Free Shit ends.
• Martial Law means cutting off the people's ability to communicate with each other. Can you imagine the ill-will generated by no more Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Pokemon and all? The kiddies will be the first to rebel against it.
• Martial Law means introducing artificial shortages in food, fuel, power. That will NOT go over well at all. Can you imagine the yuppies in Seattle without their fancy coffee, or Portland without it's craft beers?
• Martial Law collapses the economy: cash flow tanks, no one pays taxes. Sure, the gov't can hide the effects for a while, they screw with all the money supply data now, but I am talking a DEPRESSION. International trade tanks, the dollar dies on the exchanges, etc. This is too big an economy for Saudi princes to keep afloat.
• While the US military is supposedly running the country, we WILL get attacked by most of our enemies. We will lose most of our overseas personnel quickly, and the shrunken military will not be able to replace them. We will have to fly a lot of white flags, especially in the Middle East.

Notice I didn't even discuss gun confiscation?

 

 

Surveillance State the answer?

It would seem that the Surveillance (nice French word, that!) State is NOT the answer. There were 1,200 surveillance cameras in and around Nice, France. Good cameras. No one watching those cameras, apparently, because backtracking the attack vehicle shows the perp loading it with guns, etc out away from the City center. Think about it. An attentive guard can monitor MAYBE six screens showing activity at once. That would mean that the Gendarmerie needed 200 cops watching monitors on a busy night. I don't know how many they actually had, but if it was more than a dozen, I'd be surprised.

The answer here would have been to have zero road traffic permitted on the waterfront. Maybe they did, I haven't heard, but if that WAS the case, they were unprepared for a vehicle ramming the barriers.

Another answer, of course, would be to have an armed populace. If that had been a crowd on the US Gulf Coast, for example, it's likely that the vehicle would have been fired upon by many, many concealed carriers, markedly shortening the death-rampage. On Coney Island, NY? Not so much resistance. Gun-free zone.

Curious that there were apparently far more weapons on the truck than the lone perp could use. First thing that come to MY investigatory mind is: Where was the rest of the crew of Jihadis? Chickened out? Dog crossed their path and they had to go bathe and change clothes?

A different Threat, plus your responses

The events unfolding in San Bernardino show us a different threat. Not an unknown threat, just a different one.

We have been used to seeing various formats of homicidal/suicidal Jihad here: 9-11, the various Jihadi gun attacks since then, etc. All these attacks had one common characteristic: the Muslims involved were all determined to kill members of the Western Civilization, but pretty much stuck to methods which left their shock troops dead with the event. One-way attacks. Don't "pass go", Get your 72 raisins immediately.

With San Berdoo, we have just seen an attack in which the Jihadis had trained and prepared to strike with force and effect, but moved on quickly to, presumably, strike again later. Far from the normal homicide/suicide attack, this is more like revolutionary attack. This resembles what we used to refer to as a "partisan" attack. Similar to the tactics of the French or Yugoslavian partisans who attacked the Nazis during WW2. What we just saw could have been very successful for the Jihadis, and the only reason it wasn't, was better training and discipline/communication on the part of the police authorities.

My purpose here is not to figure out how to defeat this different flavor of Jihad, but to prepare the average citizen to survive it. Methods of defeat for the Muslim Jihad will have to wait for a National Command Authority determined to defeat Islamic Jihad itself, and we don't have such leadership now, we have the opposite. We have political and command leadership determined to NOT face down islamic Jihad instead of the other way around. The effect for John Q. Citizen is that he will probably have to face the shock troops of Jihad alone, possibly with the help of local police.

A personal note: I am trained in various aspects of public safety, and as events unfolded and were reported yesterday in San Berdnardino, I evaluated the events as if they were the result of criminal gang activity, since, to me, the events more resembled the activity of, say, Mexican drug cartels or the criminal gang MS-13 (both very active in San Bernardino), and both are orgs not unwilling to create mass murder to get their point across. I was wrong in that analysis, mostly because I applied the usual standard of homicide/suicide Jihad, then rejected it, and this event did not fit that model.

So, how to prepare?

1. Arm up. The protected citizen will be armed at all times, with handgun(s) within hands' reach at home and away, and a long gun close by as well. You will have to figure out how to conform to "safe storage" laws to accomplish this in your home and in your car (presumably, your "away" long gun stays in the car). At home, I have quick-reaction pistol safes (plural), and the long gun goes back in the big safe when kids are present, so I comply. In the car, I carry on my person as I am permitted to do, and my long gun is a Kel-tec folding rifle with internal lock, carried in a locking gun case, kept in the locked trunk of the vehicle.That complies with local law as well (it would NOT comply in CA or several Eastern states though).
2. Train up. At this point, if you have not already done so, join a local gun club or commercial firearms practice facility. Your preference should be one which has practice facilities for handgun (any caliber), rifle (any caliber) and shotgun. With the exceptions of no 50BMG and no full-auto, my club fits these requirements. You will need to allot sufficient funds for ammo, and/or begin to reload your chosen calibers. You will need to allot sufficient time to practice, probably a minimum of once per month in the training phase, and four times per year with all defense firearms as a maintenance-of-training effort.
3. Smarten up. Apply some common sense as to your selection of events to attend, particularly if you will be responsible for others' safety. Large outdoor events are Jihad targets of opportunity, as are crowded shopping malls. Organized athletic events in arenas and stadia are probably safer to some degree, but the Jihadis wouold love to target one for the kill ratio that they could achieve. Consider applying a sliding scale of risk to your life and it's chosen events. Yeah, that's a bummer, but we are at war, dude! You are probably safest at home, relatively safe out and about in your vehicle, safe enough doing shopping that is NOT done in large, crowded venues at peak predictable times. You are less safe in any public crowd, on mass transportation, at any outdoor event which has been heavily advertised as to attendance prospects. The training and/or dedication of your local policing authority is a factor in your relative safety also. Evaluate it.
4. Vote up. National elections are close at hand. Regardless of your political affiliation, you need to vote for your own safety. Safety is personal, and politicians and political parties which refuse to recognize your personal safety as their Job #1 should NOT get your vote. This is not about flavors of morality, this is about survival. See my note on National Command Authority, above.

Again, we are at war. The war has been brought to these shores by Islam, and it's not going to get "wished away", even though this seems to be the primary "combat strategy" of the current political Administration. YOU are responsible for your OWN safety, so make safety happen for you, NOW!

A final word. Religion. Your personal religious creed should give you the mental strength to survive the mental rigors of mortal combat. It is NOT required for that purpose, but if you hold to a creed, it will pay you to increase your attention to it in these anxious times. Your creed is your business under our Constitution. Your survival is a natural AND Constitutional Right under our system. You MUST consider anyone who attacks you for your creed or attacks your Right to survival as your enemy. Islam is attacking/denying both.

Islamic Terrorism & how to fight it

Note: that title can NOT mean "Islamic Terrorism and how to END it", because until and unless the entire Qu'ran is re-written to exclude it's main inclusionary theme of "convert or die", defeating Islamic Terrorism is not possible if ONE true believer is left alive with freedom to move around. The best we non-islamics can do is corner the Islamist killers in far-away places, applying continual and heavy enough force to keep them cornered.

The Paris attacks of 11-13-2015 are significant, because many citizens in many free nations will now realize the serious difficulty of keeping their citizens safe.

This question must be answered: What does it take to convince the leaders, parliaments, congresses and judiciaries of these free nations to put their War Faces on and effectively fight Islamism in toto?

Your blogger has had plenty of military leadership training, including (enlisted) Basic Leadership School, advanced leadership courses such as Train the Trainer, etc; (Commissioned officer) Officer Training School, Squadron Officer School (didn't finish it, skipped to Air Command & Staff College instead, per regulation). All these schools prepared me the same way, to manage conflict and lead people in conflict with a goal of winning the conflict. I received many more months of training in conflict management as a Deputy Sheriff; about 9 months' worth of formal training including 9 graduate hours of Abnormal Psych courses.

So much for me. I can lead, but I'm a bit too old to take the field, except in a gross emergency, but perhaps not all my readers have my handicaps, so here's what THIS Major thinks will work and what won't work, in short-format:

• Works: First, Identify the Enemy. People, you MUST know who you are fighting. Simple concept, yes? Simple enough, but our President REFUSES to utter the words "Islamic Terrorist". Since elected, he has "talked around" the issue of enemy identification. His obfuscation here has hurt our cause by diluting our efforts in the eyes of the Islamic world.
• Works: Partner with all prospective allies, and engage THEM as well as yourself. We have done a poor job here as well. WE are the "spine" of NATO, and NATO has paid lip-service only to the idea of fighting Islamism. Russia could be a great partner, but we have maneuvered them into the position of enemy instead - a huge mistake.
• Works: Show your Flag. Flags have one purpose, to raise emotions for a cause. This Cause is perhaps the most important that all of Civilized Earth has ever faced, and the cause itself deserves a flag, but figuratively, our leadership has prohibited flag-making.
• Works: Armor up. This is a basic, grunt-level war. Where is the USA's vaunted wartime production? There isn't any. Where is the large Army which will be needed? Our leaders are shrinking it, not building it up. Where is the military Intelligence apparatus required for this fight? Mostly missing, and what is there is riddled with spies for Islam.

What needs re-working? Here, we might do better by simply taking the brightest 10% of Second Lieutenants with fresh "butter-bars" and give them the job of re-working our military mission against Radical Islam. They WILL do a better job than all the PeeCee Generals we have running the show right now.

• Fails: We support the Enemy. Our current Foreign Policy supports Islamic nations, including most of the nations which bring this Jihad, this "Holy War", to the shores of our free Nations.
• Fails: We have NOT partnered with all our prospective allies, and those we HAVE partnered with cannot abide our present leadership and it's failures in this war.
• Fails: We don't HAVE a flag. We have Leaders who don't even show proper respect for our National Flag, let alone any possible anti-Islamist flags.
• Fails: We have relegated our Military to idiotic roles in this "fight". Senator Cruz said that we are only flying 20 to 30 air missions per day against ISIS, where we used 1,100 per day against Saddam Hussein during the Gulf War. What Cruz DIDN'T say was that 80% of the missions we DO fly are coming back with the bombs still on the wings because of insane Rules of Engagement, so we may actualy be dropping bombs from less than 5 aircraft per day. Russia, on the other hand, is flying DOZENS of missions per day, and all their aircraft come back in condition Winchester*.

This advice Ain't No Big Thing, as the troops used to say in MY war, Vietnam. No big thing, very elemental, but until we begin to respect the knowledge and leadership which starts with Corporals and Second Lieutenants, we will continue to LOSE this war. Losing is not an option if we are to remain Free Nations. The price of losing is that we will LOSE OUR FREEDOM.

@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#

*Condition Winchester. USAF fighter-pilot slang for "out of ammo".

 

 

 

Syria

"War! huh-yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Uh-huh"

(Lyric by Edwin Starr, covered by Bruce "The Boss" Springsteen, Chris Christie's favorite musician.)

Curious, because I just heard Chris Christie the candidate for POTUS claim during a Fox News interview that our current situation in the Syria mess wouldn't have happened with His Tubbiness at the helm, because he would have set up a "no-fly zone". It sounded like Tubby the One-Note Tuba thinks we could use that "solution" now.

Whotta maroon!

Look, I'm no General Patton, but I did have years of military leadership training, and I seem to remember that the thing about employing forces in battle is that the nation employing them MUST consider just how those forces could be supported BEFORE committing them to battle.

The current Air Order of Battle over Syria would involve Russian, Chinese, (maybe Israeli*) frontline fighters, all versus our forces. We have just pulled our last Carrier Task Force out of the Persian Gulf, so whatever forces we could employ on short battlefield notice have to come from Turkish bases, where we have a few aging F-16 fighters on a VERY tenuous basing agreement with NO permission to use them to fight Russians over Syria. Realisticly, if push comes to shove, we would need several re-inforced Wings of fighters and three Carrier Air Groups available to fight the current forces arrayed against the US interests. That's not going to happen, so when the first US fighter fires the first missile at a Russian/Chinese/Israeli fighter, within an hour there won't be a single US aircraft left in the region.

The Russians have maybe only a squadron or two of fighter-bombers in Syria, and the Chinese maybe just a few aircraft, but the Russ are BASED there, on the coast, and have small carriers available for naval attack variants. We are (tenuously) based in Turkey, and the unstable Ergodan government could order us out at any point with little notice. We have already sent all our US forces' dependent families home, so we KNOW our basing agreement in Turkey is tenuous.

Sorry, Governor, if you are going to sound Presidential, blow that One Note** on your tuba, this speech did little to advance your cause.

@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#

* Two days ago, the Russians sent a member of their General Staff to Israel to discuss the Russian's request to have the Israeli Defense Force involved in the current military situation vs. ISIS. The Russians announced that they wanted to use IDF intelligence, which they value highly as to it's quality, and would not object to Israeli aircraft flying reconnaissance missions over Syria, either. The two militaries discussed how to keep in constant communication, possibly even to the point of establishing credentials on each others' digital battle networks. Israel, in turn, asked for, and presumably will get, Russian help to stop Syrian groups from shipping war materials to Hezbollah. That means that The Russians will mount air attacks when the IDF spots convoys of such materials moving overland towards Lebanon, or permit the IDF to do so.

** Christie's One Note: "but-but-but, I killed the UNIONS in New Jersey" (he didn't, but he still claims he did).

What if...

What if Jihad went silent.

Think about it.

On 9-11-01, 19 un-noticeable radical Islamic men hijacked 4 aircraft and kicked off a serious war with the USA.  We have fought that war, even though our current President won't even call it a war, ever since. Introspection and history reveals that we should have been fighting it a lot sooner.

In most terror-related events since 9-11-01, we have seen terrorists express their Islamic fanaticism in stereotypical ways (shouting "Allahu Akbar"), while dressed and even armed stereotypically. The terrorists want us to see their evil side, the better to strike fear into our hearts.

Suppose, for a moment, that there ARE some smart terrorists leading Islam's war with the West, and they recognize the political fact that with Obama and the Left, Islam has an opportunity of winning it's war with the West faster*, but to gain that advantage, they would have to end the practice of in-our-face-jihad, because the images of jihad give us a mental picture of who to hate. Would they change their tactics to suit the political reality here?

You can bet your last bullet that they would, and maybe already have done so.

How do we fight this war if the terrorists hide among us and don't show themselves until they strike?

Short answer: with great difficulty, given the present leadership. We have to re-think strategies and tactics ourselves, because in reality, what difference does it make if we lose our war to radical Islam or lose a war to a Socialist dictatorship? Liberty is gone in both cases.

The answer for us is to raise our personal levels of awareness, raise our personal levels of combat-readiness, and sell these higher levels of conflict-consciousness to the less-committed at every turn.

What if there had been a couple of trained concealed-weapons carriers in that Roseburg classroom? What if the de jure State position allowing campus concealed carry did translate to the de facto side and the campuses were forced to accept that? School shootings end when the campuses are properly armed. Israel proved that over 40 years ago.

@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#@#

*Obama is losing the war for us, quickly. Ineffective military leadership from a de-professionalized and hyper-politicized military, deliberately pushing group-weakness over individual personal strengths (the rise of the gimme-gimme class), disarming veterans (the very people who, given a weapon, are the most likely to use it successfully against the enemy), all of these are war-losing strategies, not war-winning strategies.

It's ANOTHER fucked-up war, sir!

Here is a "letter from the front" from an A-10 driver. No further attribution will be given.

(start message) (note: When I pasted this from it's original format from Thunderbird, the formatting was ugly. I cleaned it up, but Typepad has never resolved this issue in the ten years I've been using it as my blog-engine. The formatting you edit in WILL fall apart, even after you save it and review it. Sorry)

 

FYSA     

     

The squadron is doing fine. Everybody is happy to be here and we are doing some good work.  The A-10s are holding up well and the technology we have on the jets now (targeting pods, GPS guided bombs, Laser Guided bombs, Laser guided missiles, tactical data link, satellite comms), and of course, the Gun, make the A-10 ideal for this conflict.  We are killing off as many ISIS as we can, mostly in ones and twos, working with the hand we are dealt. I've never been more convinced in my career that we facing an enemy that needs to be eradicated.     

     

With that being said...I've never been more frustrated in my career.  After 13 years of the mind-numbing low-intensity conflict in Afghanistan, I've never seen the knife more dull. All the hard lessons learned in Vietnam, and fixed during the first Gulf War, have been unlearned again.  The level of centralized execution, bureaucracy, and politics is staggering. I basically do not       have any decision making authority in my cockpit. It sucks. In most cases, unless a general officer can look at a video picture from a UAV, over a satellite link, I cannot get authority to engage. I've spent many hours, staring through a targeting pod screen in my own cockpit, watching ISIS perpetrate their acts until my eyes bleed, without being able to do anything about it. The institutional fear of making a mistake that has crept into the central mindset of the military leadership, is endemic.  We have not taken the fight to these guys.  We haven't targeted their centers of gravity in Raqqa. All the roads between Syria and Iraq are still intact with trucks flowing freely.  The other night I watched a couple hundred small tanker trucks lined up at an oilfield in ISIS-held northeast Syria, presumably filling up with with oil traded on the black market, go unfettered. It's not uncommon to wait several hours overhead a suspected target for someone to make a decision to engage or not. It feels like we are simply using the constructs build up in Afghanistan, which was a very limited fight, in the same way here against ISIS, which is a much more sophisticated and numerically greater foe.  It's embarrassing.     

     

Be assured that the Hawg drivers are doing their best.

 

(end of message)